摘要
2009年《侵权责任法》颁布实施后,共同危险行为、医疗侵权、物件侵权3种情形是否适用证明责任倒置?共同危险行为人承担证明责任对象单一因果关系,属于减轻或免除其责任事由,因此,共同危险行为中不存在适用证明责任倒置问题。医疗侵权纠纷中,不能笼统地说《侵权责任法》第58条属于对医方过错的证明责任倒置,但《民事证据规定》第4条关于医疗侵权因果关系证明责任倒置的规定仍应适用。建筑物等设施倒塌、妨碍通行物、地下设施的物件侵权责任不适用证明责任倒置。
The issue of this essay is whether the rules of reversed allocation of burden of proof are applicable in co - torts, medical torts and torts by obstacles. The burden on co - torffeesor to prove single causal relationship is a kind of partial defense or excuse. In addition, reversed allocation of burden of proof is not applicable in co - torts. In medical torts, section 58 of Tort Law does not general- ly allocate the burden on the medical service provides. After Tort Law became effective, section 4 of Rule of Civil Evidence still applies in medical disputes. Reversed allocation of burden of proof is not applicable in disputes of building collapses, obstacles to road and un- derground facilities.
出处
《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期53-58,共6页
Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金
国家社科基金后期资助项目(13FFX029)
山东省社会科学规划研究项目"侵权法中证明责任价值取向研究"(09BFXJ11)阶段性成果
关键词
证明责任倒置
民事证据规定
侵权责任法
reversed allocation of burden of proof
Ru/e of Civil Evidence
Tort Law
