期刊文献+

右美托咪定与拉贝洛尔在治疗颈丛神经阻滞颈部手术中不良心血管反应的临床比较 被引量:1

Clinical comparison of adverse cardiovascular reactions treated by dexmedetomidine and labetalol under cervical plexus nerve block and neck surgery
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的观察右美托咪定与拉贝洛尔在治疗颈丛神经阻滞颈部手术中不良心血管反应的效果差异。方法选择2009年5月~2013年5月本院采用颈丛神经阻滞麻醉行颈部手术患者100例,随机分成右美托咪定组(D组)和拉贝洛尔组(L组),每组各50例。D组患者在颈丛神经阻滞后辅助应用右美托咪定,维持血流动力学;L组在颈丛神经阻滞后辅助应用拉贝洛尔。观察两组患者并发症的发生情况。结果D组的并发症发生率(14.0%)显著低于L组(34.O%)(P〈0.05)。D组能很好地维持术中血流动力学稳定,且患者感觉舒适,能很好地耐受手术体位;L组血流动力学有所波动,且患者难以耐受手术体位,需加用镇静剂才可完成手术。结论在颈丛神经阻滞下行颈部手术时,使用右美托咪定能很好地维持术中血流动力学稳定,且患者能很好地耐受手术体位。 Objective To observe the effect difference of dexmedetomidine and labetalol in the treatment of adverse cardiovascular reactions under cervical plexus nerve block and neck surgery. Methods 100 patients who were under- went cervical plexus nerve block and neck surgery from May 2009 to May 2013 were selected,and they were randomly evenly divided into dexmedetomidine group(D group) and labetalol group(L group).Patients in D group and L group were provided with dexmedetomidine and labetalol respectively to maintain hemodynanfics after cervical plexus blockage.The occurrence of complications in both groups were observed. Results The incidence of complications in D group was 14.0%, which was lower than that of L group(34.0%)(P〈0.05).In D group,the hemodynamics was stably maintained,and the patients felt comfortable and the surgical positions were acceptable.However, in L group,the hemodynamics was fluctuated,and the patients couldn't bear the surgical positions,the surgery was finished only after added tranquilizer. Conclusion For neck surgery through cervical plexus blockage,dexmedetomidine can maintains the stability of hemodynamics during surgery and patients can stand the surgical positions.
出处 《中国当代医药》 2014年第2期115-116,122,共3页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 右美托咪定 拉贝洛尔 颈丛神经阻滞 颈部手术 Dexmedetomidine Labetalol Cervical plexus blockage Neck surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献27

  • 1李民,张利萍,吴新民.右美托咪啶在临床麻醉中应用的研究进展[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2007,23(6):466-470. 被引量:484
  • 2罗锡珍.全麻苏醒期患者烦躁的原因及处理[J].南通大学学报(医学版),2009,29(3):231-232. 被引量:10
  • 3庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮.现代麻醉学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:1086.
  • 4Jacobi J, Fraser GL, Coursin DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. Crit Care Med ,2002,30:119-141.
  • 5Ostermann ME, Keenan SP, Seiferling RA, et al. Sedation in the intensive care unit :a systematic review. JAMA, 2000,283: 1451-1459.
  • 6Herr DL, Sum-Ping ST, England M. ICU sedation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery:dexmedetomidine-based versus propofol-based sedation regimens. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth,2003,17:576-584.
  • 7Triltsch AE, Welte M, yon Homeyer P, et al. Bispectral index-guided sedation with dexmedetomidine in intensive care: a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled phase Ⅱ study. Crit Care Med, 2002,30 : 1007- 1014.
  • 8Venn RM, Hell J, Grounds RM. Respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine in the surgical patient requiring intensive care. Crit Care, 2000,4 : 302-308.
  • 9Arain SR, Ruehlow RM, Uhrich TD, et al. The efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus morphine for postoperative analgesia after major inpatient surgery. Anesth Analg, 2004, 98: 153- 158.
  • 10Kamibayashi T, Maze M. Clinical uses of alpha2 adrenergic agonists. Anesthesiology, 2000,93 : 1345-1349.

共引文献136

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部