期刊文献+

Use of tightrope fixation in ankle syndesmotic injuries 被引量:1

Use of tightrope fixation in ankle syndesmotic injuries
原文传递
导出
摘要 Objective: Conventional fixation of syndesmotic injuries with screws remains problematic. A novel fibrewire device (Tightrope) has suggested advantages. However, small case series have reported high soft tissue complication rates. The purpose of our study was to quantify complication rates and further procedures in patients treated with Tightropes. A secondary objective was to determine incidence of complications and further procedures in those treated with syndesmotic screws over the same period. Methods: All patients undergoing syndesmotic fixa- tion for ankle fracture between May 2008 and October 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Incidence of complications, secondary procedures, maintenance of syndesmotic reduc- tion and time spent on non-weight bearing were recorded. Family doctors were contacted for those treated with Tight- ropes to check for any complications managed elsewhere. Results: Thirty-five patients required syndesmoticfixation, in which 12 were treated with Tightropes. They were followed up in clinic for a mean of 12.4 weeks. Family doctors were contacted at mean 14.6 months after treatment to determine any complications suffered. There were no complications attributable to method of fixation. In this series, 12 patients underwent 13 procedures and no patient had recurrent diastasis at discharge; 23 patients treated with screw fixation underwent 45 procedures (19 were screw removals). There was 1 case ofsyndesmotic diastasis. Screw removal resulted in 2 minor complications. Conclusion: Tightrope fixation provideds effective syndesmotic fixation that is maintained at discharge. We do not experience soft tissue complications reported elsewhere.
机构地区 Department of Trauma
出处 《Chinese Journal of Traumatology》 CAS CSCD 2014年第1期8-11,共4页 中华创伤杂志(英文版)
关键词 ANKLE Ankle injuries Internal fixators Fracture fixation 钢丝 损伤 固定治疗 韧带 并发症 家庭医生 发生率 case
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J, Wilson G. Adult ankle frac- tures-an increasing problem [J]? Acta Orthop Scand 1998;69(1): 43-7.
  • 2Weening B, Bhandari M. Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures [J]. J Orthop Trauma 2005; 19(2): 102-8.
  • 3Schepers T. Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair [J]. Int Orthop 2012;36(6): 1199-206.
  • 4Revisiting the con Kimizuka M, Kurosawa H, Fukubayashi T. Load-bearing pattern of the ankle joint. Contact area and pressure distribution [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1980;96(1):45-9.
  • 5Ramsey PL, Hamilton W. Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58(3):356-7.
  • 6Lloyd J, Elsayed S, Hariharan K, et al. cept of talar shift in ankle fractures [J]. Foot Ankle Int 2006;27 (10):793-6.
  • 7Bava E, Charlton T, Thordarson D. Ankle fracture syndes- mosis fixation and management: the current practice of orthopedic surgeons [J]. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2010;39(5):242-6.
  • 8Nousiainen MT, McConnell AJ, Zdero R, et al. The influ- ence of the number of cortices of screw purchase and ankle posi- tion in Weber C ankle fracture fixation [J]. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22(7):473-8.
  • 9Schepers T. To retain or remove the syndesmotic screw: a review of literature [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011;131(7): 879-83.
  • 10Thornes B, Shannon F, Guiney AM, et al. Suture-button syndesmosis fixation: accelerated rehabilitation and improved out- comes [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;(431):207-12.

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部