期刊文献+

肾型n-HA/PA66腰椎间融合器在经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术中的有限元分析 被引量:5

A kidney-liked n-HA/PA66 cage In transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的设计一种新型的"肾形"n-HA/PA66腰椎间融合器(cage),通过三维有限元分析,研究其在经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)中的生物力学特性。方法建立正常人体L3-L5节段三维模型,模拟经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术,采用有限元分析方法进行应力分析,比较肾型与子弹头型n-HA/PA66腰椎间融合器应力分布的差异。结果在前屈、后伸、左右旋转工况下两种不同cage的TLIF手术模型对比,子弹头型cage最大应力分别为32.8、32.8、31.4、31.3、32.8、34.2 MPa,肾型cage最大应力分别为13.2、11.4、10.9、10.1、11.7、11.1 MPa;而且肾型cage应力集中区域小于子弹头型cage。结论肾型n-HA/PA66腰椎间融合器固定的椎体应力分布小而均匀,理论上可有效降低cage沉降率。 Objective To design a new "Kidney" like n-HA/PA66 lumbar fusion cage and analyze the biomechanics of this cage in transforaminal lttmbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using the method of finite element analysis. Methods Develop a normal intact three validated model of L3-L5 lumbar segments, compare the biomechanical difference between new kidney-liked cage and usual bullet-liked cage by simulating the TLIF using finite element analysis. Results Compare different TLIF model with the two kinds of cage, the max stress of old cage and new cage was 32.8,32.8,31.4,31.3,32.8,34.2MPa and 13.2 11.4, 10.9, 10.1,11.7 11.1MPa, separately. And the new cage' s area of stress concentration was smaller than the old cage' s. Conclusion This brand new cage has good biomechanical stability and reduced stress of the cage-endplate interface. This may reduce the sedimentation rate of cage.
出处 《中国临床解剖学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期67-71,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy
基金 国家高新技术研究发展("863")(2002AA326020) 重庆市科学技术委员会科技攻关项目(cstc2012gg-yyjs10018)
关键词 n-HA PA66腰椎间融合器 有限元分析 经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术 n-HA/PA66 lumbar fusion cage Finite element analysis Transforaminal lumbarinterbody fusion (TLIF)
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献58

共引文献50

同被引文献37

  • 1范子文,黄文铎,张美超.腰椎单、双Cage置入加椎弓根钉内固定的三维有限元分析比较[J].广州医学院学报,2005,33(5):36-39. 被引量:22
  • 2欧云生,蒋电明,权正学,安洪,刘渤.纳米羟基磷灰石/聚酰胺66复合生物活性人工椎体在胸腰椎骨折前路重建手术中的应用(英文)[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2007,21(10):1084-1089. 被引量:24
  • 3Evans JH. Biomechanics of lumbar fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1985, (193): 38-46.
  • 4Fukuta S, Miyamoto K, Hosoe H, et al. Kidney-type intervertebral spacers should be located anteriorly in cantilever transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analyses of risk factors for spacer subsidence for a minimum of 2 years. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2011, 24(3): 189-195.
  • 5Dath R, Ebinesan AD, Porter KM, et al. Anatomical measurements of porcine lumbar vertebrae. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2007, 22(5): 607-613.
  • 6Yang X, Song Y, Liu L, et al. Anterior reconstruction with nano- hydroxyapatiteIpolyamide-66 cage after thoracic and lumbar corpectomy. Orthopedics, 2012, 35(1): e66-73.
  • 7Zhao Z, Jiang D, Ou Y, et al. A hollow cylindrical nano- hydroxyapatite/polymide composite strut for cervical reconstruction after cervical corpectomy. J Clin Neurosci, 2012, t9(4): 536-540.
  • 8Le TV, Baaj AA, Dakwar E, et al. Subsidence of polyetheretherketoneintervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2012, 37(14): 1268-1273.
  • 9Vadapalli S, Robon M, Biyani A, et al. Effect of lumbar interbody cage geometry on construct stability: a cadaveric study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(19): 2189-2194.
  • 10Wang ST, Goel VK, Fu CY, et al. Comparison of two interbody fusion cages for posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a cadaveric model. Int Orthop, 2006, 30(4): 299-304.

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部