期刊文献+

单孔腹腔镜治疗精索静脉曲张疗效与安全性的Meta分析 被引量:3

Effectiveness and Safety of Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery for Varicocele: A Meta-Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的系统评价应用单孔腹腔镜行精索静脉高位结扎术的疗效及安全性。方法计算机检索h e Cochrane Library、MEDLINE、EMbase、CBM、CNKI和WanFang Data数据库,收集单孔腹腔镜和传统三孔腹腔镜比较治疗精索静脉曲张的临床随机或半随机对照试验,检索时限均从建库至2013年3月1日。由2位评价员根据纳入与排除标准独立进行文献筛选、资料提取和质量评价后,采用RevMan 5.1软件进行Meta分析。结果最终纳入7个研究,共452例患者。Meta分析结果显示:单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜下行精索静脉高位结扎术在术后并发症[RR=0.57,95%CI(0.26,1.27),P=0.17]、住院时间[MD=–0.30,95%CI(–0.87,0.26),P=0.30]、精液改善率和术中出血量方面均无明显差异,但单孔腹腔镜手术时间更长[MD=11.26,95%CI(3.62,18.90),P=0.004]。结论单孔腹腔镜下精索静脉高位结扎术具有与传统腹腔镜类似的疗效与安全性,腹部美观效果更好。但受新技术及器械的限制,手术时间稍长。由于纳入文献存在质量和数量不足,以上结论尚需开展更多高质量的临床随机对照试验予以验证。 ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for varicocele. MethodsSuch databases as The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, and WanFang Data were electronically searched for studies about LESS and traditional laparoscopy for varicocele till March 1st, 2013. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature was screened, data were extracted, and the methodological quality of included studies was also assessed. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsSeven RCTs involving 452 cases were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, there was no significant difference between LESS and traditional laparoscopy for varicocele on post-operational complications (RR=0.57, 95%CI 0.26 to 1.27, P=0.17), duration of hospital stay (MD=–0.30, 95%CI –0.87 to 0.26, P=0.30), improvement of semen parameters, and blood loss. However, LESS had longer duration of operation (MD=11.26, 95%CI 3.62 to 18.90, P=0.004). ConclusionThe effectiveness and safety of LESS and traditional laparoscopy for varicocele are similar, and LESS could achieve more beautiful and natural effects which has longer surgery time on account of non-proficiency in surgery and equipment. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusion requires to be proved by more high quality randomized controlled trials.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2014年第1期59-64,共6页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
关键词 单孔腹腔镜 精索静脉高位结扎术 系统评价 META分析 随机对照试验 Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery Varicocelectomy Systematic review Meta-analysis Randomizedcontrolled trial
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献75

共引文献29

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部