期刊文献+

Does tree species composition control the soil carbon stocks of the Hyrcanian forest in the Northern Iran?(A case study in Guilan province,Iran) 被引量:3

Does tree species composition control the soil carbon stocks of the Hyrcanian forest in the Northern Iran?(A case study in Guilan province,Iran)
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 This work studied the effects of tree species composition on soil carbon storage in five mixed stands dominated by oriental beech and grown in the western Caspian region in Guilan province, called Astara, Asalem, Fuman, Chere and Shenrud. The thickness of the litter layer, soil characteristics, tree composition and percentage of canopy coverage were measured in each stand. Total soil organic carbon differed significantly by stand. Total (organic) carbon stores at Fuman, which had the lowest tree species richness with 2 species and least canopy coverage (75%), were significantly (p〈0.05) higher than at other locations. Carbon stor-age in topsoil (0-10 cm) was significantly lower in Shenrud, which had the highest tree species richness with 5 species and highest canopy cov-erage (95%). The high percentage of canopy coverage in Shenrud proba-bly limited the conversion of litter to humus. However, in the second soil layer (10-25 cm), Asalem, with high tree species richness and canopy coverage, had the highest carbon storage. This can be explained by the different rooting patterns of different tree species. In the Hyrcanian forest. According to the results, it can be concluded that not only tree composi-tion but also canopy coverage percentage should be taken under consid-eration to manage soil carbon retention and release. This work studied the effects of tree species composition on soil carbon storage in five mixed stands dominated by oriental beech and grown in the western Caspian region in Guilan province, called Astara, Asalem, Fuman, Chere and Shenrud. The thickness of the litter layer, soil characteristics, tree composition and percentage of canopy coverage were measured in each stand. Total soil organic carbon differed significantly by stand. Total (organic) carbon stores at Fuman, which had the lowest tree species richness with 2 species and least canopy coverage (75%), were significantly (p〈0.05) higher than at other locations. Carbon stor-age in topsoil (0-10 cm) was significantly lower in Shenrud, which had the highest tree species richness with 5 species and highest canopy cov-erage (95%). The high percentage of canopy coverage in Shenrud proba-bly limited the conversion of litter to humus. However, in the second soil layer (10-25 cm), Asalem, with high tree species richness and canopy coverage, had the highest carbon storage. This can be explained by the different rooting patterns of different tree species. In the Hyrcanian forest. According to the results, it can be concluded that not only tree composi-tion but also canopy coverage percentage should be taken under consid-eration to manage soil carbon retention and release.
出处 《Journal of Forestry Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第1期143-146,共4页 林业研究(英文版)
关键词 beech forest canopy coverage soil carbon stocks tree composition beech forest, canopy coverage, soil carbon stocks, tree composition
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Adger WN, Brown K, Shiel RS, Whitby MC. 1992. Carbon dynamics of land use in Great Britain..L Environ. Manage, 36(2): 117-133.
  • 2Berger T, Hager H. 2000. Physical top soil properties in pure stands of Nor- way spruce (Picea abies) and mixed species stands in Austria. Forest Ecol Manage, 136(1-3): 159-172.
  • 3Berger T, Neubauer Ch, Glatzel G. 2002. Factors controlling soil carbon and nitrogen stores in pure stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and mixed species stands in Austria. Forest Ecol Manage, 159(1-2): 3-14.
  • 4Blake GR, Hartge KH. 1986. Bulk density, ln: A. Klute (ed.), Methods of soil analysis, Part 1.2nd ed. Agronomy Monograph 9. Madison (WI): Agron- omy Society of America and Soil Science Society of America, pp. 363-75.
  • 5Brown S, Lugo AE. 1990. Effects of forest clearing and succession on the carbon and nitrogen content of soils in Puerto Rico and US Virgin islands. Plant Soil, 124(1): 53-64.
  • 6Gee GW, Bauder JW. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: A. Klute (ed.), Methods of soil analysis, Part 1. 2nd ed. Agronomy Monograph 9. Madison (WI): Agronomy Society of America and Soil Science Society of America, pp. 383-411.
  • 7Gower ST. 2003. Patterns and mechanisms of the forest carbon cycle. Ann Rev Environ Resour, 28 (1): 169-204.
  • 8Guo LB, Gifford RM. 2002. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: A meta analysis. Global Change Biol, 8(4): 345-360.
  • 9Jennings SB, Brown ND, Sheil D. 1999. Assessing forest canopies and under-story illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures. For- estry, 72 (1): 59-74.
  • 10Johnson DW, Curtis PS. 2001. Effects of forest management on soil C and N storage: meta analysis. Forest Ecol Manage, 140 (2-3): 227-238.

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部