期刊文献+

重庆市广阳岛污水处理厂布置方案比选 被引量:5

THE EXPLORATION OF LAYOUT SCHEME SELECTION OF GUANGYANG ISLAND SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT IN CHONGQING
原文传递
导出
摘要 城市污水处理厂通常因散发气味和影响景观而易成为周边地块升值、商业开发的限制因素,地下式污水处理厂的集约化构造模式可改变这一困境,但存在技术、投资成本等方面的问题,导致污水厂布置方案的比选成为难题。本文以重庆市广阳岛污水处理厂为例,采用成本效益分析方法对2种布置形式进行方案比选,利用影响区域内外的房价差值对外部效益进行量化,采用净现值法对综合效益进行评估,研究结果表明,地下式双层加盖污水厂为广阳岛最佳推荐方案。研究为类似工程方案比选提供参考。 Urban sewage treatment plant is a limitation to estate price and business development due to the stink and landscape devastation, thanks to the intensive underground sewage treatment plant, this trouble can be pulled out. However, underground wastewater treatment plant has problems such as technology, investment cost, so how to adjust layout option to local conditions becomes a dilemma. In this paper, combined with Guangyang Island sewage treatment plant of Chongqing city, several schemes were evaluated by cost-benefit analysis method, while external benefit were quantized by the house price difference between the influenced area and outside, and the comprehensive benefit were evaluated by the net present value. The result showed that the underground sewage treatment plant was the recommended scheme for Guangyang Island, which provided reference for scheme selection and similar projects.
出处 《水处理技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期126-129,共4页 Technology of Water Treatment
关键词 地下式污水处理厂 成本效益分析 外部效益 量化 方案比选 underground sewage treatment plant cost-benefit analysis external benefit quantized scheme selection
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献41

  • 1丁晶,邓育仁.水文水资源中不确定性分析与计算的耦合途径[J].水文,1996,15(1):19-21. 被引量:12
  • 2黄伟源.成本效益分析在区域环境影响评价中的应用[J].中国环境科学,2000,20:51-51.
  • 3叶祖达,施卫良.北京长辛店低碳社区控制性详细规划[M] //中国城市科学研究会.低碳生态城市发展报告2010.中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
  • 42050中国能源和碳排放课题组.2050中国能源和碳排放报告[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
  • 5叶祖达.低碳城市发展:成本效益分析[M]//中国城市科学研究会.低碳生态城市发展报告2010.北京:中国建筑工业出版社.2010.
  • 6Pearce D, Atkinson G, Mourato S. Cost - Benefit Analysis and the Environment - Recent Developments [M]. New York: OECD Publishing, 2006.
  • 7Hicks J. Foundations of Welfare Economics [ J ]. Economic Journal, 1939(49) :696 -712.
  • 8Hicks J. The Four Consumer's Surpluses [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1943 ( 1 ) :31 - 41.
  • 9Kaldor N. Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility [J]. Economic Journal, 1939(49) :549 -552.
  • 10Hanley N. Cost-benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy Making [ J ]. Environment and Planning -, 2001 ( 19 ) : 103 - 118.

共引文献33

同被引文献31

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部