期刊文献+

全参考图像质量评价综述 被引量:85

Review on full reference image quality assessment algorithms
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 图像质量评价是图像处理领域内一项很有意义的研究课题。客观图像质量评价方法可分为全参考评价方法、半参考评价方法和无参考评价方法,目前全参考评价方法较为成熟,而半参考和无参考评价方法则处于初级阶段,远远达不到参考评价方法所能达到的效果。对全参考评价方法进行综述。首先简要地介绍了各种类型的评价方法,其次详细地介绍了PSNR、SSIM、MSSIM、IFC、VIF、FSIM等几种典型的全参考图像质量评价方法,然后在LIVE和TID2008数据库上进行实验,对这几种全参考方法进行对比、分析,最后探讨图像质量评价研究的发展趋势。 Image quality assessment is of fundamental importance to numerous image processing applications. Objective image quality metrics can be classified into three categories: full reference, semi-reference and no-reference. Currently, full reference metrics can achieve satisfied performance, while semi-reference and no-reference metrics are in their preliminary stage. This paper gave an overview of the full reference image quality assessment. Firstly, it introduced these methods briefly. Secondly, it described several important full reference image quality assessment algorithms in detail, such as PSNR, SSIM, MSSIM, IFC, VIF and FSIM. Then it compared the performance of these methods in the LIVE database and TID2008 database. Finally, this paper summarized the trends of future research on image quality assessment.
出处 《计算机应用研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期13-22,共10页 Application Research of Computers
基金 国家自然科学基金青年学者基金资助项目(60805003) 南京理工大学自主科研专项基金资助项目(2011ZDJH26)
关键词 全参考图像质量评价 结构相似性 自然场景分析 特征相似性 full reference image quality assessment structure similarity natural scene statistics feature similarity
  • 相关文献

参考文献66

  • 1WANG Zhou,BOVIK A C. Modern image quality assessment[M].New York:Morgan and Claypool Publishing Company,2006.20-30.
  • 2WANG Zhou,BOVIK A C,SHEIKH H R. Image quality assessment:from error visibility to structural similarity[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2004,(04):600-612.
  • 3AVCIBAS I,SANBUR B,SAYOOD K. Statistical evaluation of image quality measures[J].JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC IMAGING,2002,(02):206-213.
  • 4GIROD B. What's wrong with mean-squared error[A].Cambridge:The MIT Press,1993.207-220.
  • 5ESKICIOGLU A M,FISHER P S. Image quality measures and their performance[J].IEEE Transactions on Communications,1995,(12):2959-2965.
  • 6庞全,王振华,耿丽硕,范影乐.基于分形维数的图像质量客观评价方法研究[J].中国图象图形学报,2009,14(4):657-662. 被引量:2
  • 7庞建新,张荣,张晖,刘政凯.图像结构失真的编码质量评价[J].中国图象图形学报,2009,14(8):1560-1568. 被引量:4
  • 8LI Bei,MEYER W,KLASSEN V R. A comparison of two image quality models[A].San Jose:SPIE Digital Library,1998.98-109.
  • 9DAMERA-VENKATA N,KITE T D,GEISLER W S. Image quality assessment based on a degradation model[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2000,(04):636-650.
  • 10CHANDLER D M,HEMAMI S S. VSNR:a wavelet-based visual signal-to-noise ratio for natural images[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2007,(09):2284-2298.

二级参考文献206

共引文献324

同被引文献559

引证文献85

二级引证文献482

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部