期刊文献+

分离模块航天器综合评估方法研究 被引量:1

Research on the Comprehensive Assessment Method for Fractionated Spacecrafts
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以分离模块航天器概念设计阶段的方案评估分析为目标,提出一种基于数学建模和蒙特卡洛模拟的定量化评估分析方法框架。首先,定义了分离模块航天器生命周期状态及其转移过程,建立了状态转移概率矩阵,将生命周期不确定风险因素在状态转移过程中加以考虑;进而,基于系统状态模型建立了分离模块航天器生命周期成本和净收益计算模型;然后,以生命周期成本和净收益的均值和标准差作为评价指标,提出了基于蒙特卡洛模拟的综合评估仿真分析方法;最后,采用典型设计案例进行了分析与验证。 An assessment method based on mathematical model and Monte Carlo simulation is proposed for quantitively analyzing conceptual design candidates of fractionated spacecrafts. Firstly, lifecycle state and state transition process of a fractionated spacecraft are defined, and considering lifecycle uncertainty risks, the state transition probability matrix is constructed. Then, the estimation models of lifecycle cost and net profit are formulated based on the system state model of the fractionated spacecraft. Further, taking both mean and standard deviation of lifecycle cost and net profit are defined as the assessment metrics. A comprehensive assessment approach based on Monte Carlo simulations is presented. Finally, a case study is carried out by use of the proposed method for illustration and validation.
作者 杨志 刘胜利
出处 《宇航学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第12期1540-1549,共10页 Journal of Astronautics
基金 国家863高技术研究发展计划基金项目(2012AA120601)
关键词 分离模块航天器 综合评估 数学建模 蒙特卡洛模拟 Fractionated spacecraft Comprehensive assessment Mathematical modeling Monte carlo simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Dubos G F, Saleh J H. Spacecraft technology portfolio: Probabilistic modeling and implications for responsiveness and schedule slippage [J]. Acta Astronaufica, 2011, 68(7) : 1126 -1146.
  • 2赵勇,陈小前,王振国.航天器多学科设计优化研究综述[J].宇航学报,2006,27(B12):227-232. 被引量:3
  • 3Lafleur J M, Saleh J H. GT-FAST: a point design tool for rapid fractionated spacecraft sizing and synthesis [ C ]. AIAA Space 2009 Conference & Exposition, Pasadena, USA, September 14 - 17, 2009.
  • 4Dubos G F, Saleh J H. Comparative cost and utility analysis of monolith and fractionated spacecraft using failure and replacement Markov models [ J ]. Acta Astronautica, 2011, 68 ( 1 ) : 172 - 184.
  • 5Brown O, Eremenko P. Application of value-centric design to space architectures: The case of fractionated spacecraft [ C ]. AIAA Space 2008 Conference & Exposition, San Diego, USA,September 9 - 11 2008.
  • 6Brown O, Long A, Shah N, et al. System lifecycle cost under uncertainty as a design metric encompassing the value of architectural flexibility [ C ]. AIAA Space 2007 Conference & Exposition, Long Beach, USA, September 18 -20, 2007.
  • 7Brown O, Eremenko P. Fractionated space architectures: A vision for responsive space [ C ]. The 4th Responsive Space Conference, Los Angeles, USA, April 24 - 27, 2006.
  • 8Larson W J, Wertz J R. Space mission analysis and design [ M ]. Ei Segundo: Microcosm Press, 2003.
  • 9YAO Wen,CHEN Xiaoqian,ZHAO Yong,Michel van TOOREN.A Fractionated Spacecraft System Assessment Tool Based on Lifecycle Simulation Under Uncertainty[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2012,25(1):71-82. 被引量:11

二级参考文献24

  • 1王书河,何麟书.飞行器多学科设计优化概述[J].宇航学报,2004,25(6):697-701. 被引量:26
  • 2Sobieski J S, Haftka R T. Muhidisciplinary aerospace design optimization[ R]. Survey of Recent Development, AIAA 96 - 0711.
  • 3Richard Cedar. The Intelligent Master Model Process for Achieving Functional Design [ EB/OL ]. http :// www. ugs. com/products/nx/docs/wp_intelligent_ master_ model. pdf, 2004,5.
  • 4Todd Moshcr, Mark Barrera. Integration of small satellite cost and design models for improved conceptual design-to-cost[ R]. IEEE, 0- 7803 - 4311 - 5/98, 1998.
  • 5Renuganth Varatharajoo, Ralph Kahle, and Stefanos Fasoulas. Approach for combing spacecraft attitude and thermal control systems[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rocket,2003,40(5) :657 - 664.
  • 6Cullimore B, Panczak T, Baumann J. Automated multidisciplinary optimization of a space-based telescope[ R]. SAE 2002 - 01 - 2445, 2002.
  • 7Graeme B S. The generalized information network analysis methodology for distributed satellite systems[ D]. USA : Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998.
  • 8Cyrus D J. A Multiobjective. Mulidisciplinary design optimization methodology for the conceptual design of distributed satellite systems [D]. USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002.
  • 9Wilke M, Quirmbach O, Schiffer M, et al. MuSSat-a tool for satellite design in concept design centers[ C ]//Proceedings of EuSEC 2000.
  • 10Michael N A. Conceptual design tools for the NPS spacecraft design center[D]. USA: Naval Postgraduate School, 2001.

共引文献12

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部