摘要
目的:比较静脉留置针与蝶翼针在CT增强中的实用价值。方法:将CT增强扫描的患者随机分为2组,观察组1 690例,对照组1 680例。分别采用留置针与蝶翼输液针进行肘静脉穿刺输注,评价检查结束后2种方法的应用效果。结果:采用静脉留置针进行CT增强扫描的患者均顺利完成扫描,未出现造影剂渗漏现象;而采用传统蝶翼针时,其中22例患者完成扫描却有少量造影剂外渗,另有4例患者造影剂大量外渗,被迫中断增强扫描。使用静脉留置针时可在CT扫描前预先留置好,增强时直接连接高压注射器即可,节约了床旁穿刺的时间。结论:与蝶翼输液针比较,静脉留置针不但具有明显的安全性,而且还可以节省检查时间。
Objective To compare the practical values of vein detained needle and Surflo winged needle in CT enhanced scan. Methods Some patients were divided into two groups and underwent elbow vein infusion, of whom, 1 690 ones in the observation group used vein detained needles and 1 680 ones in the control group used Surflo winged needles. Then the results by the two methods were evaluated.Results The patients with vein detained needles completed scan with no contrast media leaked; while in the ones with Surflo winged needles, there were 22 ones with a few contrast media leaked and 4 ones with a great deal of leakage and the enhanced scan interrupted. Vein detained need could be pre-positioned before CT scan and connected with the high-pressure injector when enhanced scan was executed, and thus the bedside puncture time could be saved. Conolusion Vein detained needle behaves better in safety and examination time than Surflo winged needle.
出处
《医疗卫生装备》
CAS
2013年第11期70-70,76,共2页
Chinese Medical Equipment Journal
关键词
静脉留置针
蝶翼针
CT增强扫描
诊断
vein detained needle
surflo winged needle
CT enhanced scan
diagnosis
