摘要
物权的支配性、绝对性特征经不起现实规范的检验。物权概念以及物权债权区分对立体系既沿袭自罗马法法律传统,也受制于近代法律体系化的现实诉求,存在一定的不周延性。物权法定原则虽然存在不可克服的内在缺陷,但实质上担当区分物权债权、维持物债二分体系的重任。就特定物而言,其上的物权债权本质上都是人对于物一定程度的"支配力",而权利绝对效力均来源于法律政策安排或当事人的自治授予。可以通过开放"债权"登记,赋予登记后的债权具有对抗第三人绝对效力的方式,一方面弥补物权法定原则的不足,另一方面维持既有法律架构的稳定。
Actually, characteristics of the dominance and the absoluteness of property right cannot burden the examination of existed specifications. Both property right conception and the system of distinguishing property right and obligation right are not only derived from Roman law legal tradition, but also restricted by the practical demand of contemporary legal institution. Although there is an insurmountably inherent defect in the legal principle of Numerus Clausus, it distinguishes the property right from the obligation right and bears the burden of maintaining the property right and obligation right dichotomy system. With regard to the res certae, both its property right and obligation right are a kind of ＂dominance＂ of the subject to the object, and actually both hereof come from the arrangement of the legal policy or the grant of parties＇ automatic consent. We can grant the registered obligation right the legal force against a third party by establishing the registration system of ＂obligation right＂ in order to make up for the deficiency of the legal principle of statutory jus in rem and maintain the stability of existed legal framework.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第6期67-78,共12页
China Legal Science
基金
司法部项目"<物权法>背景下的物权法定与非法定物权"(项目编号:09SFB2034)研究成果
苏州大学东吴公法与比较法研究所资助
