期刊文献+

美罗培南治疗细菌感染的多中心临床研究 被引量:14

Multi Center Clinical Study on Treatment of Bacterial Infections with Meropenem
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 评价国产美罗培南的治疗效果与安全性。方法 采用多中心随机对照分层随机分组方法 ,以进口亚胺培南 /西司他丁为对照物 ,观察两种药物对 12 5例中 ,重度下呼吸道、泌尿系、烧伤创口感染等的疗效与安全性。结果 实验药对上述疾病总有效率为 89.36 % ,细菌清除率为 82 .2 6 % ,对照药物分别为 89.83%与 75 .0 0 % ,副作用发生率分别为 7.4%与 11.86 %。 OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of domestic meropenem. METHODS A randomized comparative multicenter study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of domestic meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of 125 cases of moderate and severe lower respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection and infection on the surface of wound of burn. RESULTS The clinical effective and bacteriological eradication rates were 89.36% and 82.26%, respectively in meropenem group and those of the control one were 89.83% and 75.00%, respectively. Adverse events were reported in 7.4% of patients in meropenem group and 11.86% in the control one, respectively. CONCLUSIONS There were no significant differences of efficacy and adverse effect between the two groups.
机构地区 解放军总医院
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2000年第6期413-414,共2页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词 美罗培南 亚胺培南 细菌感染 安全性 疗效 Meropenem Imipenem/cilastatin Bacterial infections Randomized comparative method
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1[1] Townsend GC, Mandell GL. The new antibiotics[J]. Vir Ginia Med Quarterly, 1997, 124(2): 108.
  • 2[2] Matsumoto T, Kumazawa J, Nagayama A. Sensitivity to four carbap enems of bacteria isolated from patients with refractory complicated urinary tra ct infections and the detection of carbapenemase-producing Ps. aeruginosa[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 1996, 38(2): 322.

同被引文献118

引证文献14

二级引证文献120

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部