期刊文献+

经后路腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的效果观察 被引量:3

Effect observation of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of lumbar disc herniation
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 探讨经后路腰椎椎体间融合术(PLIF)治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床效果.方法 选取2009年1月~2012年1月本院收治的腰椎间盘突出症患者30例,采用PLIF治疗.记录患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量及住院时间;术后随访1年,比较术前、术后6个月及1年的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、日本骨科学会腰痛评分系统(JOA)评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI),评估疗效及植骨融合率.结果 本组80例患者手术时间平均(120±43) min,术中出血量平均(250±80) ml,术后引流量平均(58±10) ml,术后住院时间平均(12±3)d.术后6个月及1年的VAS评分及ODI指数较术前降低(P<0.05),JOA评分较术前增高(P<0.05).随访1年后优良率为90.0%,腰椎间植骨融合率为96.7%.结论 PLIF治疗腰椎间盘突出症效果满意,安全性高. Objective To investigate the clinical effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Methods 30 patients with lumbar disc herniation in our hospital from January 2009 to January 2012 were selected,all were given PLIF. The operative time,blood loss,postoperative drainage and hospitalization time was recorded;the preoperative and postoperative 6 months and 1 year of the visual analogue scale (VAS),pain score Japanese Orthopaedic Association system (JOA) score and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) was compared,and the efficacy and fusion rate was observed. Results The mean operative time was (120±43) min,mean blood loss was (250± 80) ml,the average postoperative drainage was (58±10) ml,mean postoperative hospital stay was (12±3) d. After 6 months and 1 year,VAS score and ODI scores was lower than that before operation respectively (P〈0.05),JOA score was higher than that before operation (P〈0.05). After 1 year,the excellent rate was 90.0%,lumbar interbody fusion was 96.7%. Conclusion The efficacy of PLIF in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation is satisfactory,and safety is high.
出处 《中国当代医药》 2013年第35期52-53,共2页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 腰椎间盘突出症 经后路腰椎椎体间融合术 效果观察 Lumbar disc herniation Posterior lumbar interbody fusion Effect observation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献49

共引文献62

同被引文献23

  • 1张兰香.影响病人肢体骨折功能锻炼依从性的相关因素及对策[J].护理研究(下旬版),2007,21(5):1348-1349. 被引量:33
  • 2Weinstein J N, Boden S D, An H. Emerging technology in spine: should we rethink the past or move forward in spite of the past[ J]. Spine, 2003, 28 ( 15 Suppl) :S1.
  • 3La Rosa G, Conti A, Cacciola F, et al. Pediele screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis : does posterior lum- bar interbody fusion improve outcome over posterolateral fusion [ J ]. J Neurosurg, 2003, 99 (2 Suppl) : 143-150.
  • 4Lidar Z, Beaumont A, Lifshutz J, et al. Clinical and radiological relationship between posterior lumbar inter- body fusion and posterolateral lumbar fusion [ J ]. Surg Neurol, 2005,64(4) :303-308.
  • 5Cole C D, Mccall T D, Schmidt M H, et al. Compari- son of low back fusion techniques : transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fu- sion ( PL1F ) approaches [ J ]. Curt Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2009, 2(2) : 118-126.
  • 6Vivek A. Mehta, Matthew J, et al. Trans-foraminal ver- sus posterior lumbarinterbody fusion: comparison of sur- gical morbidity [ J ]. Neurological Research, 2011,33 ( 1 ) :38-41.
  • 7Zenya I, Shiro I, Tokumi K, et al. Volumetric change in interbody bone graft after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) : a prospective study [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23(10) :2144-2149.
  • 8蔡军红,刘沙林,彭海燕,黎美娟,郑粤湘.影响脑梗死病人早期功能锻炼依从性的相关因素及对策[J].护士进修杂志,2008,23(6):529-531. 被引量:15
  • 9田海军,陈德玉,卢旭华,何志敏,陈宇.腰椎融合手术方式的比较研究[J].脊柱外科杂志,2008,6(2):122-126. 被引量:3
  • 10侯艳玲.腰椎间盘突出症术后早期功能锻炼的疗效观察[J].护理研究(下旬版),2008,22(7):1915-1917. 被引量:24

引证文献3

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部