期刊文献+

The Energy Efficiency Gap in Maritime Transport 被引量:2

The Energy Efficiency Gap in Maritime Transport
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 There is evidence that the shipping industry could achieve energy efficiency gains through the implementation of new technologies, with considerable reductions of fuel costs and emissions to air in the sector. Although the cost reducing effects of some new technologies are well established, companies appear reluctant to innovate despite the financial and societal benefits, as a result of what is referred to as the energy efficiency gap. The global emission impacts of the shipping industry, most notably of greenhouse gases, sulphur and nitrogen oxides are increasingly attracting the attention of regulators, non-governmental organisations and the media, and shipping companies are under pressure to find new ways to reduce their emission footprint. Understanding the determinants of the energy efficiency gap in shipping is then critical in improving the environmental profile of the industry. This paper presents the results of a survey among Norwegian shipping companies aimed at gaining a better understanding of the barriers to implementation of new cost saving technologies. The paper assesses the technical barriers that have traditionally been indicated as the main cause of the energy efficiency gap in shipping. The paper results indicate that next to technical factors, important barriers are constituted also by managerial practices and legal constraints.
出处 《Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering》 2013年第1期1-10,共10页 船舶与海洋工程(英文版)
关键词 Energy efficiency gap emission reduction technologies barriers maritime transport. 能源效率 差距 海上运输 燃料成本 技术效果 非政府组织 航运业 社会效益
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1M. S. Eide, T. Longva, P. N. Hoffmann, O. Endresen and S. Dalsren, Future cost scenarios for reduction of ship COz emissions, Maritime Policy & Management 38 (1) (2011) 11-37.
  • 2S. Sorrell, E. O'Malley, J. Schleich and S. Scott, The Economics of Energy Efficiency: Barriers to Cost-Effective Investment, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2004.
  • 3H. Johnson and K. Andersson, The energy efficiency gap in shipping: Barriers to improvement, International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference, Santiago de Chile, 25th-28th of October 2011.
  • 4M. Acciaro, P. N. Hoffmann and M. S. Eide, Identifying and overcoming barriers to the implementation of emissions reduction measures in shipping, DNV Report No. 2010-1800, 2012.
  • 5Gordon S., Steering towards Change: Overcoming barriers to Energy Efficiency in Merchant Ships, MSc Thesis, MSc in Environmental Change & management, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, 2009.
  • 6C. Girard, Exploring a decision framework for evaluating cost-effectiveness and utility of CO2 abatement measures in shipping, NTNU MSc thesis, 2010.
  • 7P. Hoffmann, Y. Longva and M. S. Eide, CAST system documentation and user manual, DNV report no. 2010-0863, 2010.
  • 8H. Johnson and K. Andersson, Barriers to Energy Efficiency: Why Shipping Firms fail to Improve, mimeo. 2012.
  • 9H. Johnson, M. Johansson and K. Andersson, Barriers to energy efficiency in short sea shipping: A case study, Short Sea Shipping 2012.Conference, 2nd-3rd of April 2012, Lisbon, 2012.
  • 10R. Sudhakar and J. P. Painuly, Diffusion of renewable energy technologies -- barriers and stakeholders' perspectives, Renewable Energy 29 (2004) 1431-1447.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部