期刊文献+

小展弦比立式曲面网板的水动力性能 被引量:15

Hydrodynamic characteristics of low aspect ratio vertical cambered otter board
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究不同倾角和迎流冲角下小展弦比立式曲面网板的水动力性能,通过水槽模型实验计算网板的升力系数(CL)、阻力系数(CD)、浮力系数(CZ)和升阻比(K)。结果显示:(1)CL和K随冲角(α)的增加呈先升后降趋势,CD随冲角的增加呈上升趋势;(2)无倾角情况下,冲角为30°时,升力系数最大值CLmax=1.699,此时CD=1.140,K=1.490。冲角为15°时,升阻比最大值Kmax=2.421,此时CL=1.120,C。=0.463;(3)横倾角(β)在-10°~10°变化时,CLmax=1.816(α=25°,β=-10°),Kmax=3.405(α=10°,β=-10°)。横倾角为-5°和-10°时,网板具有一定浮力。冲角为10°~30°时,CZ平均值分别为0.16和0.25;(4)纵倾角(γ)在-10°~10°变化时,CLmax=1.823(α=25°或α=30°,γ=-10°),Kmax=2.729(α=5°,γ=-5°)。纵倾角为-5°、-10°和5°时,网板具有一定浮力。冲角为10°~30°时,CZ平均值分别为0.16、0.18和0.16。结果表明,该网板的最佳工作冲角范围为15°~30°,该冲角范围内网板CL〉1.1且K〉1.45。 For analyzing the hydrodynamic performance of low aspect ratio vertical cambered otter board at different angles of inclination and angle of attack,the lift coefficient( CL ), drag coefficient( CD ) ,buoyancy coefficient( CZ )and lift to drag ratio (K)were calculated through the tank model experiment. The experimental results were as follows: ( 1 ) CL and K showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the increase of angle of attack ( a), CD reflected an upward trend with the increase of α ; (2) With no angle of inclination, when α = 30°, the max lift coefficient ( CLmax ) was 1. 699, in this case CD = 1. 540, K = 1. 490. When α = 15 °, the max lift to drag ratio ( Kmax ) was 2.421, in this case CL = 1. 120, CD = 0. 463 ; ( 3 ) When the heeling angle(β) changed between - 10° - 50°, CLmax = 1. 816( α = 25° ,β = -10°) ,Kmax = 3. 405 (α = 10°,β = -10°). The otter board had a certain buoyancy when β was -5° and -10°,the average buoyancy coefficient was 0.16 and 0.25 respectively, when α was between 10° -30°;(4)When the trim angle(γ) changed between - 10° - 10°, CLmax = 1. 823 (α = 25° or α = 30°,γ = - 10°) , Kmax = 2. 729 ( α = 5γ,γ = - 5°). The otter board had a certain buoyancy when γ was - 5°, - 10° and 5°, the average buoyancy coefficient was 0.16,0.18 and 0.16 respectively, when α was between 10° -30°. It is suggested that the best working scope of angle of attack was between 15° - 30° ,in which case CL 〉 1.1 and K 〉 1.45. Finally compared the hydrodynamic performance of different types of otter board, we provided a reference basis for the rational use and further development of the new types of otter board.
出处 《水产学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期1742-1749,共8页 Journal of Fisheries of China
基金 国家"八六三"高技术研究发展计划(2012AA092301) 公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201203018) 国家科技支撑计划(2013BAD13B03)
关键词 立式曲面网板 水动力性能 模型实验 vertical cambered otter board hydrodynamic characteristics model test
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1郭根喜,刘同渝,黄小华,等.拖网网板动力学理论研究与实践[M].广州:广东科技出版社,2008:160-211.
  • 2徐宝生,张勋,王明彦.单船拖网网板的现状及发展趋势[J].福建水产,2010,32(1):86-90. 被引量:25
  • 3张勋,王明彦,徐宝生.拖网网板型式、结构与性能的研究与应用进展[J].中国水产科学,2004,11(z1):107-113. 被引量:20
  • 4徐宝生,张勋,郁岳峰,王明彦,陈裕,李志国,李锬垚,胡海波,林贤.矩形V型曲面网板和V型网板生产性对比试验[J].海洋渔业,2006,28(1):66-70. 被引量:13
  • 5陈雪忠,黄锡昌.渔具模型试验理论与方法[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2011:388-425.
  • 6Salaa A, Farranb J P, Antonijuan J, et al. Performance and impact on the seabed of an existing- and an experimental-otterboard Comparison between model testing and full-scale sea trials[J]. Fisheries Research, 2009,100 ( 2 ) : 156 - 166.
  • 7Park H H. A method for estimating the gear shape of a mid-water trawl [ J ]. Ocean Engineering, 2007,34 (3 -4) :470 -478.
  • 8Prat J, Antonijuan J, Folch A, etal. A simplified model of the interaction of the trawl warps, the otterboards and netting drag [ J ] . Fisheries Research, 2008,94(1) :109 - 117.
  • 9SunX F,Yin Y, Jin Y C, etal. The modeling of single-boat, mid-water trawl systems for fishing simulation [ J ]. Fisheries Research, 2011,109 ( 1 ) : 7 -15.
  • 10福田賢吾,松田佼,胡夫祥,等複葉型オッターボードの流体特性に関する模型実験[J].日本水産撃曾誌,1997,63(2) :207 - 212.

二级参考文献22

共引文献43

同被引文献127

引证文献15

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部