期刊文献+

往复荷载作用下自复位墙受力机理研究 被引量:12

STUDY ON THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF SELF-CENTERING WALL UNDER CYCLIC LOADING
原文传递
导出
摘要 该文以自复位墙作为研究对象,将其简化成一刚体,分别仅考虑自重、考虑预应力筋影响及同时考虑预应力筋和阻尼器的影响,通过理论推导得出了往复荷载作用下的水平力-转角曲线,研究了其在往复荷载作用下的受力机理。研究表明:自复位墙墙体自重和预应力筋共同提供自复位能力,阻尼器提供耗能能力;自复位墙的力学性能与墙体几何尺寸、预应力筋及阻尼器参数有关。 The self-centering wall is simplified as a rigid body, while the horizontal load vs. rotation curve of the self-centering wall subjected to cyclic loading is obtained by theoretical derivation. Three cases are taken into account to investigate the mechanical behavior of the self-centering wall, i.e. only considering the self-weight of the self-centering wall, considering the effect of prestressed tendons, and considering both the influence of prestressed tendons and dampers. The study presented in this paper indicates that for the self-centering wall, the prestressed tendons provide the self-centering ability along with the gravity of the wall, while the dampers can dissipate energy. In addition, the mechanical performance of the self-centering wall depends on the dimensions of wall, the design parameters of prestressed tendons and dampers.
出处 《工程力学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期202-206,共5页 Engineering Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51208386) 湖北省自然科学基金项目(2011CDB266) 武汉大学引进人才科研启动项目(273528)
关键词 自复位墙 预应力筋 阻尼器 受力机理 耗能 self-centering wall prestressed tendon damper mechanical behavior energy dissipation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献60

  • 1FEMA 273 NEHRP guidelines and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings [ S ]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997.
  • 2FEMA 356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[ S]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
  • 3FEMA 445 Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines: program plan for new and existing buildings [ S]. Washington DC, USA : Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2007.
  • 4Report of the seventh joint planning meeting of NEES/ E-defense collaborative research on earthquake engineering[ R]. PEER 2010/109. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, 2010.
  • 5Roh H. Seismic behavior of structures using rocking columns and viscous dampers [ D ]. Buffalo : University at Buffalo, The State University of New York. Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, 2007.
  • 6Housner G W. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes [ J ]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53 (2) : 403- 417.
  • 7Hukelbridge A A, Clough R W. Preliminary experimental study of seismic uplift of a steel frame [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/22. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
  • 8Hukelbridge A A. Earthquake simulation tests of a nine story steel frame with columns allowed to uplift [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/23. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
  • 9Priestley M J N, Evison R J, Carr A J. Seismic response of structures free to rock on their foundations [ J ]. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1978, 11 (3) : 141-150.
  • 10Makris N, Konstantinidis D. The rocking spectrum and the shortcomings of design guidelines [ R ]. Report No. PEER-01/07. Bekeley : University of California, Berkeley. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2001.

共引文献303

同被引文献114

引证文献12

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部