期刊文献+

不同年龄小儿穿孔性阑尾炎流行病学及临床表现差异分析 被引量:37

Age-specific epidemiology and clinical features of perforated appendicitis in children
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析不同年龄段儿童急性穿孔性阑尾炎流行病学和临床表现的差异,为改进急性穿孔性阑尾炎的早期诊断提供理论依据。方法收集近20年本院收治的急性穿孔性阑尾炎患儿的临床资料。根据年龄分为新生儿及婴幼儿组(1d至3岁)、学龄前组(4~7岁)、小学年龄组(8~12岁)、青春期组(13~16岁)。统计穿孔性阑尾炎的性别比例和年龄分布。计算比较不同年龄段患儿的穿孔率。比较不同月份不同年龄段患儿穿孔性阑尾炎的发病情况。分析不同年龄段患儿穿孔性阑尾炎主要临床症状、体征、实验室及影像检查的差异。结果本院近20年共收治急性阑尾炎5859例,其中穿孔性阑尾炎1446例,男936例,女510例,男女比1.84:1,总穿孔率为24.68%。不同年龄段患儿阑尾炎穿孔率分别为:新生儿及婴幼儿组28.65%,学龄前组28.63%,小学年龄组22.64%,青春期组13.35%。穿孔性阑尾炎发病呈季节性分布,其中夏季7、8、9三个月发病率最高,而2、3、4三个月发病率最低。腹痛是各年龄组最常见症状,各年龄组发生率无明显差异(P〉0.05)。转移性右下腹痛仅出现于15.70%的患儿中,且随年龄增长发生率逐渐增加。发热、呕吐、厌食、腹泻等症状发生率随年龄增长逐渐降低,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。而转移性右下腹痛和腹部压痛及肌紧张的发生率随年龄增长逐渐升高,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。中性粒细胞比例新生儿及婴幼儿组低于小学年龄组和青春期组,C反应蛋白水平新生儿及婴幼儿组高于小学年龄组和青春期组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。腹部平片和B型超声显示青春期组肠梗阻征和肠壁增厚伴蠕动减少的发生率高于其他各组,B型超声和CT显示小学年龄组和青春期组阑尾粪石出现率高于新生儿及婴幼儿组和学龄前组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论阑尾炎穿孔率随年龄的变化而不同。穿孔性阑尾炎发病呈季节性分布。不同症状、体征在不同年龄组的发生率有显著差异。不同年龄组患儿中性粒细胞比例和C反应蛋白不同。部分影像学表现在不同年龄组患儿中出现率不等。 Objective To examine the epidemiology and clinical features of perforated appendici- tis (PA) in children by age group. Methods Medical charts of pediatric acute appendicitis (AP) pa- tients hospitalized between January 1991 and December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. All pa- tients were divided into four age groups: group Ⅰ : ld-3yr; group Ⅱ : 3yr-7yr; group Ⅲ : 7yr-12yr; and group Ⅳ: 12yr-16yr. Results Among 5859 AP patients, 1446 patients (24. 68%) suffered from PA (male to female 936:510). The perforation frequency of each subgroup was 28. 65%, 28. 63%, 22. 64%, and 13. 35%, respectively. The incidence of PA showed clear seasonality with a peak in summer. Abdominal pain was the most frequently complained symptom, with a constant frequency a- mong all age groups (P〉0. 05). Shifting pain was reported in only 15.70% of patients and showed a frequency increasing with age. As compared to groupsⅢ and Ⅳ, groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ were more likely to complain of non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms (P〈0. 05), but less likely to exhibit appendicitis- associated abdominal signs (P〈0. 01). Neither the overall white cell count nor frequency of leukocy-tosis varied significantly among four age groups (P〉 0. 05). Neutrophil was significantly lower in group Ⅰ than tha in groups III and IV (P〈0.05). Serum C-reactive protein level was significantly higher in group Ⅰ than that in groups Ⅲ and Ⅳ (P〈0. 05). Abdominal radiographs in group IV were more likely to show signs of bowel obstruction or pseudo-obstruction as compared to group Ⅰ-Ⅲ (P〈0. 05). Fecaliths were more frequently observed in groups Ⅲ and IV (P〈0. 05). Conclusions Youn- ger pediatric patients have a higher risk of complicating PA, and also differ significantly from their ol- der counterparts in terms of clinical features.
出处 《中华小儿外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期814-818,共5页 Chinese Journal of Pediatric Surgery
基金 上海市科委重点基金(044119602)
关键词 阑尾炎 儿童 年龄因素 流行病学 Appendicitis Child Age factors Epidemiology
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1G:irleyik G, Gtirleyik E. Age-related clinical features in older patients with acute appendicitis. Eur J Emerg Meal,2003, 10 (3) : 200-203.
  • 2Augustin T, Cagir B, Vandermeer TJ. Characteristics of perforated appendicitis: effect of delay is confounded by age and gender. J Gastrointest Surg,2011, 15(7) : 1223-1231.
  • 3Lee JH, Park YS, Choi JS. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in South Korea: national registry data. J Epidemiol,2010, 20(2) :97-105.
  • 4A1-Omran M, Mamdani M, McLeod RS. Epidemiologic features of acute appendicitis in Ontario, Canada. Can J Surg, 2003, 46 (4) : 263-268.
  • 5Udgiri N, Curras E, Kella VK, et al. Appendicitis, is it an emergency? Am Surg,2011, 77(7) : 898-901.
  • 6Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, et al. Changingepidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993-2008. J Surg Res,2012, 175(2) : 185-190.
  • 7Stein GY, Rath-Wolfson L, Zeidman A, et al. Sex differences in the epidemiology, seasonal variation, and trends in the management of patients with acute appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg,2012, 397(7) ; 1087-1092.
  • 8Noudeh YJ, Sadigh N, Ahmadnia AY. Epidemiologic features, seasonal variations and false positive rate of acute appendicitis in Shahr-e-Rey, Tehran. lnt J Surg,2007, 5(2): 95-98.
  • 9Baglaj M, Rysiakiewicz J, Rysiakiewicz K. Acute appendicitis in children under 3 years of age. Diagnostic and therapeutic problems. Med Wieku Rozwoj,2012, 16(2) : 154-161.
  • 10Amboldi A, Veneroni F. Acute appendicitis in patients under 5 and over 60 years of age. G Chir, I990, 11(9):481-486.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Berry JJr, Malt RA. Appendicitis near its centenary. Ann Surg,1984, 200:567-575.
  • 2Velanovich V, Satava R. Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance. Am Surg, 1992,58: 264-269.
  • 3Memon MA, Fitztgibbons RJJr. The role of minimal access surgery in the acute abdomen. Surg Clin N Am, 1997, 77:1333-1353.
  • 4Gilmour IEW, Lowdon AGR. Acute appendicitis. Edib Bed J,1952, 59:361-373.
  • 5Heafield R, Roe AM, Watkins R, et al. Outcome of emergency surgical admissions for non-specific abdominal pain. Gut, 1990, 31:Al167.
  • 6Komer H, Sondenaa K, Soreide JA, et al. Structured data collection improves the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg, 1998,85: 341-344.
  • 7Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, et al. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg, 1999, 229: 344-349.
  • 8Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, et al. The epidemiolgy of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol,1990, 132: 910-925.
  • 9Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ. Appendicetomy for acute appendicitis and for other conditions: An epidemiological study. Int J Epidemiol,1994, 23: 156-160.
  • 10Hale DA, Molloy M, Pearl RH, et al. Appendectomy: A contemporary appraisal. Ann Surg, 1997: 225-261.

共引文献64

同被引文献280

引证文献37

二级引证文献204

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部