摘要
代际气候正义概念是气候伦理命题证成的关键。在论证代际气候正义的时候,史军先生选择的是强调历史责任的历史主义研究进路,但是这种研究方法是有问题的。历史责任很可能受到祖先过去的"可原谅的无知"的限制,采用的是集体主义的方法论,主张把国家当作研究的基本单位,却没有看到个人、组织以及国际制度和法律的影响。而且,强调发达国家的当代人为祖先的排放行为负责很可能导致另一种意义上的不平等。只有以勘定责任承担的时间分割点为基础,采用个人主义的研究进路,才能在真正意义上尊重平等的价值。
The concept of intergenerational climate justice is the key to testify ethical climate. When dem- onstrate intergenerational climate justice, Mr. SHI Jun chose historicism approach which emphasizes ＂Histori- cal Responsibility＂. Such kind of research method is debatable. ＂Historical Responsibility＂ is likely to be lim- ited to the ＂Forgivable Ignorance＂ of ancestors, which uses collectivism methodology, arguing that ＂nation＂ is the basic unit of research, ignoring the individual, the organization and the international system and the impact of the law. Moreover, it is unfair for contemporary human beings to pay for their ancestors＇ behaviors of emis- sions. Equality can only be achieved by dividing time division point of responsibility and using the individualistic approach to achieve the value of equality in the true sense.
出处
《阅江学刊》
2013年第5期39-43,57,共6页
Yuejiang Academic Journal
基金
2013年江苏省研究生创新工程资助项目"正义与公平:应对气候变暖的伦理研究"(CXLX13_00)
江苏省社会科学基金项目"国际气候谈判的制约因素与协商机制研究"(12ZZD009)
江苏省教育厅重点研究基地"气候变化与公共政策研究院"开放课题"由‘争’到‘和’--气候治理的民主模式及其伦理基础"(12QHB004)
关键词
气候变化
代际正义
平等
历史责任
“可原谅的无知”
climate change
intergenerational justice
equality
historical responsibility
Forgivable Ig-norance
