摘要
汉宋之分与汉宋之争是清代学术发展的一大主线。民国学界诚为汉宋之争的变相,"新汉学"与"新宋学"的分合成为民国学人沟通中西新旧的聚焦点。民国"新汉学"以科学考据著称,其义理关怀以西学为准则,期望再造文明。国难之际,陈寅恪、蒙文通等学人盛赞"汉人之经学,宋人之史学",有意针对胡适"新汉学"一系,欲在汉宋之外,另辟新径。陈寅恪倡导宋代学术复兴与"新宋学之建立",揭示输入外来学说与不忘本来民族地位之"相反而适相成"的文化出路。蒙文通以经今文学说为本位,发明秦汉新儒学沟通汉宋,效法南宋浙东史学,重建中华文明体系。以此为线索,考察民国学人对"新儒学"、宋学与宋史、中国文化的义理与制度等问题的多歧认知,当可展现晚近学人实践近代学术转型的苦心孤诣,深入辨析传统学术近代出路的多元抉择与路径。
The division between Han Learning and Song Learning,and struggles between the two,formed the main line ol development of Qing dynasty scholarship.Republican scholarship was actually a continuation of the Han-Song controversies in another form,and the division and convergence between the 'New Han learning' and the 'New Song Learning' became the focal point for Republican intellectuals as they navigated between Chinese and Western,between new and old.During the Republican period,the 'New Han Learning' was famous for its scientific textual research.Its attention to universal truths was modeled on Western scholarship,and hoped to rebuild the civilization.In the midst of national calamity,Chen Yinque, Meng Wentong and other scholars highly praised the formula 'Confucian Studies of the Han Dynasty and Historiography of the Song Dynasty,' deliberately targeting Hu Shi's 'New Han Learning' school,and aiming to open up a new path beyond Han Learning and Song learning.Chen Yinque advocated a revival of Song scholarship and the establishment of the 'New Song Learning.' Chen pointed out a path to advance culture by embracing the 'complementary opposites' of introducing foreign learning while maintaining the original status of national culture.Based on New Text theories,Meng Wentong set out to re-build the Chinese cultural system and emulated the Southern Song Dynasty's Kaslern Zhejiang school of historiography by devising a 'New Confucianism of the Qin and Han Dynasties' to link Han learning and Song learning.By following these leads to explore the different understandings Republican scholars had of problems such as 'New Confucianism',Song Learning and Han learning,universal truth,and systems of Chinese culture,we can reveal the painstaking efforts of Republican scholars to achieve a transformation in modern scholarship,and can deeply analyze the diverse choices that faced traditional scholarship as it sought a path forward.
出处
《近代史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第6期94-113,160-161,共20页
Modern Chinese History Studies
