期刊文献+

经食管床与经胸骨后上提路径行管状胃食管吻合术后患者生活质量的比较研究 被引量:17

Comparative study on the quality of life in patients with prevertebral or retrosternal reconstruction after cervical tubular gastroesophagostomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较经食管床与经胸骨后两种上提路径行管状胃食管颈部吻合术后患者的生活质量。方法前瞻性纳入2008年7月至2012年6月问汕头市中心医院收治的、拟行食管癌切除术的167例患者,按随机数字表法随机分为食管床路径组(85例)和胸骨后路径组(82例)。分别于术后1、3、6、9及12月进行生活质量问卷调查。结果除吻合口狭窄发生率食管床路径组低于胸骨后路径组外(P〈0.05),两组患者围手术期一般情况的差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。149例患者完成了术后生活质量问卷调查,食管床路径组术后吞咽梗阻和吞咽干呕两项症状明显优于胸骨后路径组,但反酸和烧心两项症状则相对更严重(均P〈0.05)。两组患者总体生活质量评分的差异并无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论经食管床路径和经胸骨后路径行管状胃食管吻合术用于食管癌切除术后消化道重建均可获得较好的术后生活质量。前者术后吞咽功能优于后者,但反流症状却更为显著,因此,两种吻合方式各有利弊,应根据临床经验及患者情况进行选择。 Objective To compare the quality of life in patients with prevertebral or retrosternal reconstruction after cervical tubular gastroesophagostomy. Methods A total of 167 patients enrolled in this prospective study from July 2008 to June 2012 in Shantou Central Hospital, and divided into prevertebral route group(85 cases) and retrosternal route group(82 cases) according to the random number table method. Quality of life questionnaire was investigated 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after operation respectively. Results The incidence of anastomotic stenosis was lower in the prevertebral route group (P〈0.05). However, the differences in perioperative general conditions between the two groups were not statistically significant (all P〉0.05). One hundred and forty-nine patients completed the postoperative quality of life questionnaire. Dysphagia and swallowing retching symptom were better, while acid reflux and heartburn symptom were more serious in prevertebral route group as compared to retrosternal route group (all P〈0.05). Overall quality of life score difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P〉0.05). Conclusions For digestive tract reconstruction after resection of esophageal cancer, tubular gastroesophagostomy by prevertebral or retrosternal route both can obtain better quality of life after surgery. Swallowing function after surgery of the former is superior to the latter, but the reflux symptoms is more serious. Therefore the two mehods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of route should be depended on clinical experience and patient condition.
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2013年第11期1088-1091,共4页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
基金 汕头市重点科技计划(汕府科[2009]70-8号)
关键词 食管肿瘤 管状胃 经食管床路径 经胸骨后路径 生活质量 Esophageal neoplasms Gastric tube Prevertebra route Retrosternal route Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1冯明祥,王群,蒋伟,汪灏,钱成,谭黎杰.食管切除术后管状胃不同上提径路的比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2010,13(1):33-35. 被引量:15
  • 2Haverkort EB, Binnekade JM, persistence of nutrition-related Busch OR, et al. Presence and symptoms during the first year following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction in clinically disease-free patients. World J Surg, 2010,34 : 2844-2852.
  • 3Lagergren P, Avery KN, Hughes R, et al. Health-related quality of life among patients cured by surgery for esophageal cancer. Cancer, 2007,110 : 686-693.
  • 4Panebianca V, Francioni F, Anzidei M, et al. Magnetic resonance-fluoroscopy as long-term follow-up examination in patients with narrow gastric tube reconstruction after radical esophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2006,30:663-668.
  • 5Buunen M, Rooijens PP, Smaal HJ, et al. Vascular anatomy of the stomach related to gastric tube construction. Dis Esophagus, 2008,21 : 272-274.
  • 6Anegg U, Lindenmann J, Maier A, et al. Influence of route of gastric transposition on oxygen supply at cervical oesophagogastric anastomoses. Br J Surg, 2008,95 : 344-349.
  • 7McLarty A J, Deschamps C, Trastek VF, et al. Esophageal resection for cancer of the esophagus: long-term function and quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg, 1997,63 : 1568-1572.
  • 8Blazeby JM, Williams MH, Brookes ST, et al. Quality of life measurement in patients with oesophageal cancer. Gut, 1995,37 : 505-508.
  • 9Kato H, Miyazaki T, Sakai M, et al. Videofluoroscopic evaluation in oropharyngeal swallowing after radical esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Anticaneer Res, 2007,27 : 4249-4254.
  • 10Katsoulis IE, Bobotis I, Kouraklis G, et al, Duodenogastric reflux after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up:the effect of the route of reconstruction. World J Surg, 2005,29 : 174-181.

二级参考文献11

  • 1冯明祥,谭黎杰,蒋伟,钱成,王群.电视胸腔镜食管癌根治性切除术20例[J].复旦学报(医学版),2007,34(6):856-858. 被引量:38
  • 2Anegg U,Lindenmann J,Maier A,et al.Influence of route of gastric transposition on oxygen supply at cervical oesophagogastric anastomoses.Br J Surg,2008,95(3):344-349.
  • 3Kunisaki C,Makino H,Otsuka Y,et al.Appropriate routes of reconstruction following transthoracic esophagectomy.Hepatogastroenterology,2007,54(79):1997-2002.
  • 4Ngan SY,Wong J.Lengths of different routes for esophageal replacement.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,1986,91(5):790-792.
  • 5Niederle B,Burghuber OC,Boka P,et al.Influence of transthoracic and transmediastinal esophagectomy and of various degrees of gastric filling in cardiopulmonary function.Preliminary results of an experimental study in the dog.Dis esophagus,1988:237-244.
  • 6Mannell A,McKnight A,Esser JD.Role of pyloroplasty in the retrosternal stomach:results of a prospective,randomized,controlled trial.Br J Surg,1990,77(1):57-59.
  • 7Van Lanschot JJ,Hop WC,Voormolen MH,et al.Quality of palliation and possible benefit of extra-anatomic reconstruction in recurrent dysphagia after resection of carcinoma of the esophagus.J Am Coll Surg,1994,179(6):705-713.
  • 8Katsoulis IE,Robotis I,Kouraklis G,et al,Duodenogastric reflux after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up:the effect of the route of reconstruction.World J Surg,2005,29(2):174-181.
  • 9Kato H,Miyazaki T,Sakai M,et al.Videofluoroscopic evaluation in oropharyngeal swallowing after radical esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.Anticancer Res,2007,27(6C):4249-4254.
  • 10谭黎杰,王群,冯明祥,葛棣,徐正浪,蒋伟,徐松涛,丁建勇,郭卫刚.电视胸腔镜食管切除术在食管癌外科治疗中的应用[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2008,11(1):24-27. 被引量:33

共引文献14

同被引文献158

引证文献17

二级引证文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部