期刊文献+

二元语义Bonferroni集成算子及其在多属性群决策中的应用 被引量:14

Twotuple Iinguistic Bonferroni Aggregation Operators and Their Applications to Multi-attribute Group Decision-making
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Bonferroni平均算子的优点是在进行信息集成的过程中能够考虑到输入变量之间的相互影响。本文首先将其推广到语言环境中,提出了二元语义Bonferroni平均(2TLBA)算子、加权2TLBA(W2TLBA)算子和组合W2TLBA(C-W2TLBA)算子的概念,研究它们的相关性质。然后针对决策信息以语言变量给出的多属性群决策问题,提出一种基于W2TLBA算子和C-W2TLBA算子的群决策方法。最后应用实例说明了该方法是切实可行的。 The advantage of the Bonferroni mean operator is its capability to capture the interrelationship between input arguments. In this paper, we extend the Bonferroni mean operators to the situation where the inputs are linguistic arguments and proposed 2-tuple linguistic Bonferroni averaging (2TLBA)operator, weighted 2TLBA (W2TLBA) operator and combined W2TLBA (C-W2TLBA) operator. Moreover, some desirable properties and special cases of these aggregation operators are investigated. According to the multi-attribute group decision-making with the decision information being linguistic arguments, a decision-making approach is presented based on W2TLBA operator and C - W2TLBA operator. At last, a numerical experiment is given to prove the feasibility of the developed approach.
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期122-127,共6页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371011 71301001) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(13YJC630092) 教育部高等学校博士点基金基金资助项目(20123401110001) 留学回国人员科研启动项目 安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(1308085QG127) 安徽省高校省级自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2012A026) 安徽省教育厅人文社科项目(SK2013B041)
关键词 多属性群决策 二元语义Bonferroni平均(2TLBA)算子 加权2TLBA(W2TLBA)算子 组合W2TLBA(C—W2TLBA)算子 multi-attribute group decision-making 2-tuple linguistic Bonferroni averaging(2TLBA)operator weighted 2TLBA (W2TLBA) operator combined W2TLBA (C-W2TLBA) operator
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1徐泽水.不确定多属性决策方法与应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005:1-18
  • 2Herrera F, Martinez L. A 2-Tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words[ J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2000, 8(6): 746-752.
  • 3Xu Y J, Wang H M. Approaches based on 2 - tuple linguistic power aggregation operators for muhiple attribute group decision making under linguistic environment [ J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2011, 11 (5) : 3988-3997.
  • 4Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Aggregation operators for linguistic weighted information[ J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-part A: Systems and Humans, 1997, 20(5) : 646-656.
  • 5Torra V. The weighted OWA operator[ J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1997, 12(2) : 153-166.
  • 6Xu Z S. A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations[ J]. Information Sciences, 2004, 166 ( 1 ) : 19-30.
  • 7Xu Z S. Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach linguistic environmentfJ1. Information Sciences. 2004. 168(1 : to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain 171-184.
  • 8姜艳萍,樊治平.基于不同粒度语言判断矩阵的群决策方法[J].系统工程学报,2006,21(3):249-253. 被引量:46
  • 9Yager R R. On generalized Bonferroni mean operators for multi-criteria aggregation [ J ]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2009, 50(8) : 1279-1286.
  • 10Xu Z S. Uncertain Bonferroni mean operators [ J ], Internatlonal Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2010, 3 (6) : 761-769.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Hwang C L, Lin M J. Group Decision Making Under Multiple Criteria[ M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1987.
  • 2Herrera F, Martinez L. A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multi-granularity hierarchical hnguistic contexts in multiexpert decision-making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B, 2001, 31(2): 227-234.
  • 3Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L. A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic terms sets in decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 114(1): 43-58.
  • 4Herrera F, Martinez L. A 2-tuple fuzzy hnguistic representation model for computing with words[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2000, 8(6): 746-752.
  • 5Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A sequential selection process in group decision-making with linguistic assessments[J]. Information Sciences, 1995, 85: 223-229.
  • 6Marimin M, Umano M, Hatono I, et al. Linguistic labels for expressing fuzzy preference relations in fuzzy group decision making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B, 1998, 28(2): 205-218.
  • 7Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996, 78(1): 73-87.
  • 8Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G. A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, 1997, 27(1): 126-132.
  • 9Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A model of consensus in group decision making under hnguistic assessments[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996, 79(1): 73-87.
  • 10Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 115(1): 67-82.

共引文献53

同被引文献165

引证文献14

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部