期刊文献+

盲肠结扎穿孔与腹腔持续置管引流两种脓毒症大鼠模型的比较 被引量:8

Comparison of the cecal ligation and puncture vs.colon ascendens stent peritonitis in the rat model of sepsis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 通过分组比较盲肠结扎穿孔(CLP)与腹腔持续置管引流(CASP)脓毒症大鼠模型.方法 将126只Wistar大鼠随机分为4组,即正常组、假手术组、CLP组和CASP组;CASP组根据不同大小静脉留置针(规格型号:14G、16G和18G)分为3个亚组.分别于建模后的6、12、24、48 h记录大鼠体质量变化和采血,应用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测外周血白细胞介素(IL)与、-10及肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α水平,并观察大鼠术后72 h生存率.结果 CLP组的72 h生存率为45.8%.在CASP模型中,18G组生存率为50.0%,高于16G组的33.3%和14G组的8.3%(P<0.01).CASP-14G、16G和18G组24 h时的体质量差值分别为(17.1±7.3)、(14 6±4.4)和(14.2±5.0)g,均高于CLP组(8.5±3.5) g(P <0.05).CASP组在各时间点的IL-6、IL-10及TNF-α水平明显高于CLP组(P<0.01).随着升结肠置管管径的增大,IL-6、IL-10及TNF-α水平也随之升高(P<0.05,除48 h时IL-10及TNF-α外).术后24 h尸体解剖发现,CLP组大鼠腹腔内感染灶大多形成局部炎性包裹,而CASP组大鼠腹腔脏器水肿充血明显,肠淤积,但未见明显炎性包裹形成.结论 本研究建立并对比两种常用脓毒症大鼠模型;CLP模型侧重于局限性腹腔脓肿形成的病理变化,而CASP模型偏向于弥漫性腹膜炎的临床病程. Objective To compare cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) vs. colon ascendens stent peritonitis (CASP) sepsis rat models. Methods A total of 126 Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups: normal control group, sham group, CLP group and CASP group. The CASP group was subdivided into 3 subgroups according to the diameter of the inserted stent ( 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge). The 72 h sur- vival rate was observed after operation. The body weight change, and serum interleukin (IL) -6, IL-10 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels were analyzed at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after operation. Results The 72 h survival rate in CLP group was 45.8% and 50% in CASP-18G subgroup, which was higher than in CASP-16G subgroup (33.3%) and CASP-14G subgroup (8.3%). There was significant difference among the three CASP subgroups ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Body weight change in CASP group at 24 h was higher than in CLP group (P 〈 0.05). The serum levels of IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α in CASP group at each time point were sig- nificantly higher than in CLP group (P 〈 0.01 ). With the diameter increasing of the inserted stent, serum IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α levels were elevated (P 〈0. 05, except for IL-10 and TNF-α at 48 h). Abdominal situs was analyzed after 24 h and we found an intra-abdominal abscess exhibiting in CLP group, but CASP rats had massive edema, paralysis of the intestine and vasodilation of intestinal vessels. Conclusion This study has established and compared two rat models of sepsis. The CLP model focused on the pathological changes of intra-abdominal abscess formation, and CASP model was similar to the clinical course of diffuse peritonitis.
出处 《中华实验外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期2452-2454,共3页 Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81160235) 广西研究生教育创新计划资助项目(2011105981002M208)
关键词 脓毒症 盲肠结扎穿孔 腹腔持续置管引流 模型 动物 Sepsis Cecal ligation and puncture Colon ascendens stent peritonitis Model,animal
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1汤耀卿,李磊.脓毒症动物模型制作方略及应用[J].中华实验外科杂志,2006,23(12):1433-1434. 被引量:59
  • 2Zanotti-Cavazzoni SL,Goldfarb RD.Animal models of sepsis.CritCare Clin,2009,25:703-719.
  • 3Zantl N,Uebe A,Neumann B,et al.Essential role of gamma interferonin survival of colon ascendens stent peritonitis,a novel murine modelof abdominal sepsis.Infect Immun,1998,66:2300-2309.
  • 4Traeger T,Koemer P,Kessler W,et al.Colon ascendens stent perito-nitis(CASP)-a standardized model for polymicrobial abdominal sep-sis.J Vis Exp,2010,46:l-5.
  • 5Rittirsch D,Huber-Lang MS,Flierl MA,et al.Immunodesign of exper-imental sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture.Nat Protoc,2008,4:31-36.
  • 6Maier S,Traeger T,Entleutner M,et al.Cecal ligation and punctureversus colon ascendens stent peritonitis:two distinct animal models forpolymicrobial sepsis.Shock,2004,21:505-512.
  • 7Schabbauer G.Polymicrobial sepsis models:CLP versus CASP.DrugDiscov Today Dis Models,2012,9:17-21.
  • 8郭振华,李力,刘巨超,张兰,徐迎新.一种改良小鼠脓毒症模型的建立[J].中华实验外科杂志,2008,25(4):510-512. 被引量:5
  • 9Toscano MG,Ganea D,Gamero AM.Cecal ligation puncture proce-dure.J Vis Exp,2011,51:1-5.
  • 10燕晓雯,李维勤,黎介寿,李宁.通过改变盲肠结扎长度制造不同感染程度的大鼠盲肠结扎穿孔模型[J].中华实验外科杂志,2007,24(11):1340-1340. 被引量:10

二级参考文献13

  • 1张利华,黎介寿.全肠外营养及免疫调节剂对腹腔感染大鼠免疫功能的调节[J].中华实验外科杂志,1994,11(4):240-241. 被引量:12
  • 2赵永福,翟文龙,宋燕,张水军.乙酰半胱氨酸对脓毒症大鼠炎症介质的影响及对肝脏的保护作用[J].中华实验外科杂志,2006,23(6):683-684. 被引量:5
  • 3汤耀卿,李磊.脓毒症动物模型制作方略及应用[J].中华实验外科杂志,2006,23(12):1433-1434. 被引量:59
  • 4Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med ,2004,32 : 858 -873.
  • 5Chaudry IH ,Wichterman KA, Baue AE. Effect of sepsis on tissue adenine nucleotide levels. Surg, 1979,85:205 -211.
  • 6Ebong S J, Call DR, Bolgos GL, et al. lmmunopathologic responses to non-lethal sepsis. Shock, 1999,12 : 118-126.
  • 7Wichterman KA, Baue AE ,Chaudry IH. Sepsis and septic shock-A review of laboratory models and a proposal. Surg Res, 1980,29: 189- 201.
  • 8Fink MP, Heard SO. Laboratory models of sepsis and septic shock. Surg Res, 1990,49 : 186-196.
  • 9Buras JA, Holzmann B, Sitkovsky M. Animal models of sepsis : setting the stage. Nat Rev Drug Discov,2005 ,4 :854-865.
  • 10Simpson A J, Smith MD, Weverling GJ, et al. Prognostic value of cytokine concentrations (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6,and interleukin-10) and clinical parameters in severe melioldosis. J Infect Dis,2000,181 : 621-625.

共引文献75

同被引文献65

引证文献8

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部