期刊文献+

Removal of nitric oxide from simulated flue gas via denitrification in a hollow-fiber membrane bioreactor 被引量:5

Removal of nitric oxide from simulated flue gas via denitrification in a hollow-fiber membrane bioreactor
原文传递
导出
摘要 A hollow-fiber membrane bioreactor (HMBR) was studied for its ability to treat nitric oxide (NO) from simulated flue gas. The HMBR was operated for 9 months and showed a maximum elimination capacity of 702 mg NO/(m2.day) with a removal efficiency of 86% (gas residence time of 30 sec, inlet NO concentration of 2680 mg/m^3, pH 8). Varying operation parameters were tested to determine the stability and response of the HMBR. Both the inlet NO concentration and gas residence time influenced the removal of NO in the HMBR. NO elimination capacity increased with an increase in inlet NO concentration or a shortening of gas residence time. Higher removal efficiency of NO was obtained at a longer gas residence time or a lower inlet NO concentration. Microbial communities of the HMBR were sensitive to the variation in pH value and alkalescence corresponding to an optimum pH value of 8. In addition, NO elimination capacity and removal efficiency were inversely proportional to the inlet oxygen concentration. Sulfur dioxide had no great influence on elimination capacity and removal efficiency of NO. Product analysis was performed to study N20 and N2 production and confirmed that the majority of the microorganisms were denitrifying bacteria in the HMBR. Compared to other bioreactors treating NO, this study showed that the denitrifying HMBR was a good option for the removal of NO. A hollow-fiber membrane bioreactor (HMBR) was studied for its ability to treat nitric oxide (NO) from simulated flue gas. The HMBR was operated for 9 months and showed a maximum elimination capacity of 702 mg NO/(m2.day) with a removal efficiency of 86% (gas residence time of 30 sec, inlet NO concentration of 2680 mg/m^3, pH 8). Varying operation parameters were tested to determine the stability and response of the HMBR. Both the inlet NO concentration and gas residence time influenced the removal of NO in the HMBR. NO elimination capacity increased with an increase in inlet NO concentration or a shortening of gas residence time. Higher removal efficiency of NO was obtained at a longer gas residence time or a lower inlet NO concentration. Microbial communities of the HMBR were sensitive to the variation in pH value and alkalescence corresponding to an optimum pH value of 8. In addition, NO elimination capacity and removal efficiency were inversely proportional to the inlet oxygen concentration. Sulfur dioxide had no great influence on elimination capacity and removal efficiency of NO. Product analysis was performed to study N20 and N2 production and confirmed that the majority of the microorganisms were denitrifying bacteria in the HMBR. Compared to other bioreactors treating NO, this study showed that the denitrifying HMBR was a good option for the removal of NO.
出处 《Journal of Environmental Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2013年第11期2239-2246,共8页 环境科学学报(英文版)
基金 supported by Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Source and Environment,Harbin Institute of Technology(No.QA201313)
关键词 nitric oxide DENITRIFICATION hollow-fiber membrane bioreactor BIOFILM nitric oxide denitrification hollow-fiber membrane bioreactor biofilm
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献90

  • 1Ahmed Z,Cho J,Lim B R,Song K G,Ahn K H,2007.Effects of sludge retention time on membrane fouling and microbial community structure in a membrane bioreactor.Journal of Membrane Science,287(2):211-218.
  • 2Bae T H,Tak T M,2005.Interpretation of fouling characteristics of ultrafiltration membranes during the filtration of membrane bioreactor mixed liquor.Journal of Membrane Science,264(1-2):151-160.
  • 3Bai R,Leow H F,2002.Microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater-the effect of system operation parameters.Separation and Purification Technology,29(1):189-198.
  • 4Chang I-S,Clech,P L,Jefferson B,Judd S,2002.Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment.Journal of Environmental Engineering,128(11):1018-1029.
  • 5Chinese SEPA,2002.Water and wasterwater monitoring methods (4th ed).Beijing:Chinese Environmental Science Publishing House.
  • 6Cho J,Song K G,Ahn K H,2005.The activated sludge and microbial substances influences on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor:unstirred batch cell test.Desalination,183(1-3):425-429.
  • 7Defrance L,Jaffrin M Y,1999.Reversibility of fouling in activated sludge filtration.Journal of Membrane Science,157(1):73-84.
  • 8Defrance L,Jaffrin M Y,Gupta B,Paullier P,Geaugey V,2000.Contribution of various constituents of activated sludge to membrane bioreactor fouling.Bioresource Technology,73(2):105-112.
  • 9DuBois M,Gilles K A,Hamilton J K,Rebers P A,Smith F,1956.Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances.Analytical Chemistry,28(2):350-356.
  • 10Evenblij H,Geilvoet S,Graaf J H J M van der,Roest H F van der,2005.Filtration characterisation for assessing MBR performance:three cases compared.Desalination,178(1-3):115-124.

共引文献69

同被引文献44

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部