期刊文献+

剖宫产术后再次妊娠的分娩方式研究 被引量:15

暂未订购
导出
摘要 本研究探讨剖宫产术后再次妊娠的不同分娩方式对产妇及新生儿的影响,现将结果报告如下。
作者 张尊梅
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2013年第17期179-180,共2页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献104

  • 1杨洪波,李晶,陈杜平,狄锋宇.剖宫产后再次妊娠的分娩方式探讨[J].实用妇产科杂志,2004,20(5):273-274. 被引量:111
  • 2张小勤.剖宫产术后再次妊娠177例分娩方式分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(1):57-58. 被引量:261
  • 3林国翘.剖宫产后再次妊娠的产科处理(附131例临床分析)[J].实用妇产科杂志,1996,12(1):22-23. 被引量:79
  • 4朱世钗,金慧佩,朱世霞,赵雅萍,耿晓虹.剖宫产术后再次妊娠子宫局部疤痕愈合的超声评价[J].温州医学院学报,2006,36(4):394-395. 被引量:9
  • 5Blackwell SC, Hassan SS, Wolfe HM, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean in the diabetic gravida [ J ]. J Reprod Med, 2000,45 : 987 -990.
  • 6Elkousy MA, Sammel M, Stevens E, et al. The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates[ J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2003,188 : 824-830.
  • 7Esposito MA, Menihan CA, Malee MP. Association of interpregnancy interval with uterine scar failure in labor: a case-control study [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2000,183 : 1180-1183.
  • 8Shipp TA, Zelop CM, Repke JT, et al. Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 97 : 175 -177.
  • 9Bujold E,Mehta SH, Bujold C,et al. Interdelivery interval and uterine rupture [ J 1. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 187 : 1199- 1202.
  • 10Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2005,89 ( 3 ) : 319-331.

共引文献659

同被引文献111

  • 1毛圆圆,陈友国,舒铭铭,杨伟文.198例前置胎盘的临床分析[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2010,4(7):1096-1098. 被引量:17
  • 2王爱香.剖宫产术后再妊娠经阴道分娩164例分析[J].中国乡村医药,2004,11(11):22-23. 被引量:64
  • 3付凌婕,张惠丹,陈惠池.选择性剖宫产对新生儿脐血纤溶酶活性及免疫因子的影响[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(10):611-613. 被引量:34
  • 4毛卉.10年剖宫产率及指征分析[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2007,39(3):364-365. 被引量:8
  • 5王富英.疤痕子宫再次足月妊娠的分娩方式选择[J].中国美容医学,2011,20(Z2):347-348.
  • 6Roberge S, Boutin A, Chaillet N, et al. Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant states imaging techniques and uterine scar defect [J]. American journal of peri- natology, 2012, 29(06) 5 465-472.
  • 7Jastrow N, Chaillet N, Roberge S, et al. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect z a systematic review [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2010, 32(4): 321-327.
  • 8Domr6se C M, Geipel A, Berg C, et al. Second-and third-tri- mester termination of pregnancy in women with uterine scar-a retrospective analysis of 111 gemeprost-induced terminations of pregnancy after previous cesarean delivery [J]. Contraception, 2012, 85(6): 589-594.
  • 9Ceci O, Cantatore C, Scioseia M, ez al. Ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic outcomes of uterine scar healing after cesarean section: Comparison of two types of single - layer suture [J]. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaeeology Research, 2012, 38(11) 1302-1307.
  • 10B6rub L, Boutin A, Jastrow N, etal. P30. 10z Factors associ- ated with the location of uterine scar defect in women with previ- ous low - transverse Cesarean [J]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics Gynecology, 2012, 40(S1): 293-293.

引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部