期刊文献+

大地电磁阻抗估计方法对比 被引量:17

Comparison of methods for magnetotelluric impedance estimation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 比较了几种大地电磁阻抗估计方法的性能。为了给阻抗估计结果提供对照标准,首先介绍大地电磁模拟数据的生成方法,并从含噪数据中提取典型的噪声时间序列;然后介绍最小二乘估计、M回归估计、有界影响估计和重复中值估计这4种回归方法的基本原理,并用一组标准数据测试了它们的性能;最后采用4种估计方法处理不同程度加噪的模拟数据,与模拟结果进行比较。结果表明:重复中值估计的稳健性最优;当磁道存在噪声时,有界影响估计给出了明显优于M回归估计的结果,也能满足要求。因此,在实测数据处理中,推荐使用重复中值估计方法与有界影响估计方法。 The performances of different kinds of methods for magnetotelluric impedance estimation were compared. The method of generating magnetotelluric simulated data was introduced, the typical noise series was extracted from noisy data. The basic principles of four regression methods of least square estimator, M-regression estimator, bounded influence estimator and repeated median estimator were introduced. These methods were tested using a set of standard data. At last, simulated data added by noise at different levels were processed by the four different estimators and compared with the simulated results. The results show that the repeated median estimator is the most robust. When the noise exists in the magnetic channel, the results estimated by the bounded influence method are acceptable, which are more stable than those estimated by the M-regression method. So, in the magnetotelluric data processing, the repeated median method and bounded influence method are recommended.
出处 《中国有色金属学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第9期2351-2358,共8页 The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals
基金 国家科技专项"深部探测技术与实验研究专项"(SinoProbe-03) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(40874072 41104071)
关键词 大地电磁 稳健阻抗估计 M回归估计 有界影响估计 重复中值估计 magnetotelluric robust estimation M-regression estimation bounded influence estimation repeated medianestimation
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1GAMBLE T D, GOUBAU W M, CLARKE J. Magnetotellurics with a remote magnetic reference[J]. Geophysics, 1979, 44(1): 53-68.
  • 2RITTER O, JUNGE A, DAWES G. New equipment and processing for magnetotelluric remote reference observations[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1998, 132(3): 535-548.
  • 3LARSEN J C, MACKIE R L, MANZELLA A, FIORDELISI A,RIEVEN S. Robust smooth magnetotelluric transfer functions[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1996, 124(3): 801-819.
  • 4OETTINGER G, HAAK V, LARSEN J C. Noise reduction in magnetotellurie time-series with a new signal-noise separation method and its application to a field experiment in the Saxonian Granulite Massif[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2001, 146(3): 659-669.
  • 5EGBERT G D, BOOKER J R. Robust estimation of geomagnetic transfer functions[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1986, 87(1): 173-194.
  • 6CHAVE A D, THOMSON D J. ANDER M E. On the robust estimation of power spectra, coherences, and transfer functions[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1987 92(B1): 633-648.
  • 7CHAVE A D, THOMSON D J. Some comments on magnetotelluric response function estimation[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1989, 94(B10): 14215-14225.
  • 8CHAVE A D, THOMSON D J. A bounded influence regression estimator based on the statistics of the hat matrix[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 2003, 52(3): 307-322.
  • 9CHAVE A D, THOMSON D J. Bounded influence magnetotelluric response function estimation[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2004, 157(3): 988-1006.
  • 10SMIRNOV M Y. Magnetotelluric data processing with a robust statistical procedure having a high breakdown point[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2003, 152(1): 1-7.

二级参考文献58

共引文献109

同被引文献175

引证文献17

二级引证文献104

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部