期刊文献+

中性粒细胞CD64诊断新生儿败血症的Meta分析 被引量:5

Diagnostic value of Neutrophil CD64 for neonatal sepsis:A meta-analysis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的评价中性粒细胞CD64对新生儿败血症的诊断价值。方法检索Pubmed上截止2013年3月以前发表的关于中性粒细胞CD64诊断新生儿败血症的英文文献。以QUADAS工具对文献进行评价,通过随机效应模型分析其总体诊断敏感性、特异性、阳/阴性预测值和诊断优势比。以sROC曲线法分析其总体诊断价值。结果 11项研究最终进入了本次Meta分析。中性粒细胞CD64诊断新生儿败血症的总体敏感性为75%(95%CI:72%~78%);特异性为77%(95%CI:75%~78%);阳性似然比为4.62(95%CI:2.95~6.17);阴性似然比为0.30(95%CI:0.20~0.44);诊断优势比(DOR)为15.68(95%CI:8.64~28.44);sROC曲线下面积为0.87,Q值为0.80。已有的研究之间存在较大的异质性。结论中性粒细胞CD64对新生儿败血症具有相对较高的诊断准确性。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic performance of neutrophil CD64 for neonatal sepsis.Methods English-language studies published in Pubmed before March 2013,which focused on the diagnostic efficiency of neutrophil CD64 for neonatal sepsis,were retrieved.The quality of included studies was evaluated by QUADAS tools.The diagnostic sensitivity,specificity,negative/positive likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratio(DOR)were pooled by random-effects models.The overall diagnostic performance was estimated by summary receiver operating characteristic(sROC)curves approaches.Results Eleven studies were included in present meta-analysis.The summary estimates for neutrophil CD64 in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis were as follows:sensitivity,75% (95%CI:72%-78%);specificity,77% (95% CI,75%-78%);positive likelihood ratio,4.62(95% CI,2.95-6.17);negative likelihood ratio,0.30 (95%CI,0.20-0.44);and DOR,15.68 (95%CI,8.64-28.44).The area under curve(AUC)for neutrophil CD64 was 0.87 with Q value of 0.80.Significant heterogeneity was observed among included studies.Conclusion Neutrophil CD64 has high diagnostic accuracy for neonatal sepsis.
出处 《国际检验医学杂志》 CAS 2013年第20期2673-2674,2677,共3页 International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词 中性粒细胞CD64 新生儿败血症 诊断价值 META分析 neutrophil CD64 neonatal sepsis diagnosis value Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1王晓茵,刘雅婧.11769例住院新生儿疾病构成及死亡原因分析[J].中华儿科杂志,2003,41(7):551-552. 被引量:55
  • 2陈大庆.新生儿败血症辅助检查评价[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2005,20(2):102-105. 被引量:58
  • 3余加林.新生儿败血症的诊断和治疗[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2005,20(2):100-102. 被引量:70
  • 4Hoffmann JJ. Neutrophil CD64:a diagnostic marker for infection and sepsis[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2009, 47 (8) : 903-916.
  • 5Ng PC,Lam HS. Diagnostic markers for neonatal sepsis[J]. Curr Opin Pediatr,2006,18(2):125-131.
  • 6Whiting P,Rutjes AW,Reitsma JB,et al. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy : a systematic review[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2004,140(3) : 189-202.
  • 7Whiting :P,Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, et al. The development of QUADAS : a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracY included in systematic reviews[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2003,3: 25.
  • 8Walter SD.Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic(SROC) curve for diagnostic test data[J]. Stat Med,2002, 21 (9): 1237-1256.
  • 9DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials[J]. Control Clin Trials, 1986,7(3): 177-188.
  • 10Higgins JP,Thompson SG, Deeks J J, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses[J]. BMJ, 2003,327 (7414): 557-560.

二级参考文献18

共引文献177

同被引文献72

  • 1赵丽丽,张立明,王润秀,蒙诚跃,欧斌贤.烧伤感染患者外周血CD64、C-反应蛋白的表达及其临床意义[J].中国现代医药杂志,2012,14(4):9-11. 被引量:2
  • 2林慧君,邱莲女,周永列,吴茅,吴建国.外周血CD64表达对鉴别诊断小儿急性上呼吸道感染的价值[J].江西医学检验,2005,23(4):295-296. 被引量:8
  • 3徐茜茜,陈灵芝,徐海滨,张宇,包曼华.CD64在早产儿细菌性感染中的应用价值[J].中国免疫学杂志,2007,23(2):161-163. 被引量:7
  • 4Alien E, Bakke AC, Purtzer MZ, et al. Neutrophil CD64 expression:distinguishing acute inflammatory autoimmune disease from systemic infections [J] . Ann Rheum Dis, 2002, 61 (6) : 522-525.
  • 5Wakefield CH, Carey PD, Foulds S, et al. Polymorphonuclear leuko- cyte activation. An early marker of the postsurgical sepsis response [J] . Arch Surg, 1993, 128 (4) : 390-395.
  • 6Weirich E, Rabin RL, Maldonado Y, et al. Neutrophil CDllb expres- sion as a diagnostic marker for early-onset neonatal infection [J] . J Pediatr, 1998, 132 (3 Pt 1) : 445-451.
  • 7Nupponen I, Andersson S, Jarvenpaa AL, et aL Neutrophil CD1 lb ex- pression and circulating interleukin-8 as diagnostic markers for early- onset neonatal sepsis [J] . Pediatrics, 2001, 108 (1) : E12.
  • 8Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000 [ J]. N Engl J Med, 2003,348 ( 16 ) : 1546-1554.
  • 9Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States : analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care [J]. Crit Care Med,2001,29(7) : 1303-1310.
  • 10Otero RM, Nguyen HB, Huang DT, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock revisited: concepts, controversies, and contemporary findings [ J ]. Chest, 2006, 130 (5) :1579-1595.

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部