期刊文献+

一般自我效能感量表的性别与跨文化项目功能差异分析 被引量:8

Detecting Differential Item Functioning in the General Self Efficacy Scale across Gender and Cultures
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探讨一般自我效能感量表的项目在性别与跨文化中是否存在项目功能差异,检验量表在性别及文化中的公平性,采用基于因素分析的测量等价性方法对来自26个国家及地区的19896名被试进行分析。结果发现一般自我效能感量表在性别上不存在项目功能差异的项目;霍夫斯塔德四个文化分区框架下,该量表在四个维度上存在不同数量的项目功能差异的项目。一般自我效能感量表对男性和女性被试是公平的,使用该量表直接进行性别上差异分析得出的结论是有意义的;文化维度上存在功能偏差项目,对不同文化下得出的效能感上存在差异的结论则应该慎重对待,且产生项目功能差异的原因仍需要进一步的相关研究。 The purpose of the current study was to detect differential item functioning in the General Self Efficacy Scale across gender and cultures. According to the Reise's procedure, 19896 individuals from 26 countries/regions were analyzed. No differential item functioning was found across gender groups; However, there was differential item functioning on different cultures which were based on Hofstede's framework. Six biased items were detected in individualism versus collectivism dimensionality, three items in femininity versus masculinity, four items in power distance and five items in uncertainty avoidance. The General Self Efficacy Scale was no differential item functioning across gender, which was fair for males and females. Although there were differential item functioning in subcultures, they had micro influence on the findings of across cultures studies. The differential item functioning mode should be taken into consideration, be- cause it varied among cultures. It was a cultures difference that beyond the current accumulated data.
出处 《心理研究》 2013年第5期38-41,56,共5页 Psychological Research
关键词 一般自我效能感量表 性别 文化 项目功能差异 自信 General Self Efficacy Scale gender, cultures differential item functioning
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Zumbo B D. A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF). Ottawa : National Defense Headquarters, 1999.
  • 2Reise S P, Widaman K F & Pugh R H. Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two ap- proaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psy- chological Bulletin, 1993, 114(3):' 552-566.
  • 3邓稳根,戴海琦,戴慧群.采用项目功能差异方法分析艾森克人格问卷的性别差异[J].中国卫生统计,2012,29(1):17-20. 被引量:3
  • 4骆方,张厚粲.检验项目功能差异的两类方法—CFA和IRT的比较[J].心理学探新,2006,26(1):74-78. 被引量:12
  • 5Stark S, Chernyshenko 0 S & Drasgow F. Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Toward a unified strategy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(6): 1292-1306.
  • 6Chan D. Detection of differential item functioning on the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory using multi- pie-group mean and covariance structure analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2000, 35(2): 169- 199.
  • 7王才康,胡中锋,刘勇.一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究[J].应用心理学,2001,7(1):37-40. 被引量:3235
  • 8Scholz U, Dofia B efficacy a universal from 25 countries. Assessment, 2002, G, Sud S, et al. Is general self- construct? Psychometric findfiings European Journal of Psychological 18(3) : 242-251.
  • 9Luszczynska A, Scholz U & Schwarzer R. The general self-efficacy scale: Multicuhural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 2005, 139(5): 439-457.
  • 10Hofstede G. Culture and organizations: Software of the mind. London, Norfolk: McGraw-Hill Book Company (UK) Limited, 1991.

二级参考文献50

  • 1曾秀芹,孟庆茂.项目功能差异及其检测方法[J].心理科学进展,1999,9(2):41-47. 被引量:27
  • 2陈仲庚.艾森克人格问卷的项目分析[J].心理学报,1983,15(2):211-218. 被引量:385
  • 3Feingold A.Gender differences in personality:A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin,1994,116(3):429-456.
  • 4Canals J,Vigil-Colet A,Chico E,et al.Personality changes during adolescence:The role of gender and pubertal development.Personality andIndividual Differences,2005,39(1):179-188.
  • 5Eysenck HJ.Sex and Personality,Open Books Publishing Ltd,London,1976.
  • 6Barrick MR,Mount MK.The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance:A meta-analysis.Personnel Psychology,1991,44(1):126.
  • 7Barrick MR,Mount MK.Autonomy as a moderator of relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance:A meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology,1993,78(1):111-118.
  • 8Ones DS,Viswesvaran C,Schmidt FL.Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities:Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,1993,78(4):679-703.
  • 9Escorial S,Navas MJ.Analysis of the gender variable in the Eysenck personality questionnaire revised scales using differential item functioning techniques.Educational and Psychological Measurement,2007,67(6):990-1001.
  • 10Andrich D,Luo G.A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding dichotomous single-stimulus responses.Applied Psychological Measurement,1993,17(3):253-276.

共引文献3263

同被引文献81

引证文献8

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部