期刊文献+

几种杀菌剂对桃褐腐病的毒力测定及田间控制作用 被引量:6

Toxicity and Field Efficiency of Several Fungicides against Peach Brown Rot
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]筛选防治大连地区桃褐腐病的有效药剂。[方法]用菌丝生长速率法测定了70%甲基硫菌灵WP、250 g/L嘧菌酯SC、400 g/L克菌·戊唑醇SC及80%克菌丹WG与430 g/L戊唑醇SC(质量比5∶1)混剂对桃褐腐病菌室内抑制作用,并进行了田间药效试验,质量浓度分别为875、167、400、800、143 mg a.i./L。[结果]4种杀菌剂对该菌的EC50值分别为0.35、111.63、0.72、0.25 mg a.i./L;田间防效分别为86.51%、88.44%、70.51%和68.78%。[结论]甲基硫菌灵、复配杀菌剂克菌·戊唑醇对大连地区桃褐腐病菌具有较强毒力,可作为常规药剂与其他杀菌剂交替使用。 [Aims] The study aims to evaluate the control effect of several fungicides on the peach brown rot in Dalian. [Methods] Mycelium growth method was used to measure and compare the toxicities of thiophanate-methyl 70% WP, azoxystrobin 250 g/L SC, Tebu-C 400 g/L SC and the mixtures of captan 80% WG and tebuconazole 430 g/L SC with ratios of 5 : 1 to Monilinia, meanwhile, the field control were conducted as well. [Results] The ECs0 values of 4 fungicides were 0.35, 111.63, 0.72 and 0.25 mg a.i./L respectively. Four fungicides showed good control effect to the peach brown rot in field trial, with 86.51, 88.44, 70.51 and 68.78%, respectively at the concentration of 875, 167, 400, 800 and 143 mg a.i./L, respectively. [Conclusions] Thiophanate-methyl 70% WP and captan 80% WG display better controlon peach brown rot in Dalian, they can be applied alternately with other fungicides.
出处 《农药》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第10期771-772,779,共3页 Agrochemicals
基金 国家桃产业技术体系建设专项经费资助(nycytx-31) 北京市科技新星计划资助项目(2009B28)
关键词 桃褐腐病 杀菌剂 毒力 田间试验 peach brown rot fungicide toxicity field trial
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献59

  • 1刘万仁,王崇仁,吴友三.核盘菌可溶性蛋白质及同工酶电泳研究[J].真菌学报,1989,8(1):62-69. 被引量:5
  • 2Landgraf F A, Zehr E I. Inoculum resources for Monilinia fructicola in South Carolina peach orchard[J]. Phytopathology, 1982, 72:185- 190.
  • 3Biggs A R, Northover J. Inoculum resources for Monilinia fructicola in Ontario peach orchards[J].Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 1985, 7:302-307.
  • 4Jenkins P T, Reinganum C. The occurrence of a quiescent infection of stone fruit caused by Monilinia fructicola (Wint.) Rehm[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1965, 16:131 - 140.
  • 5Zhu X Q, Chen X Y, Luo Y, et al. First report of Monilinia fructicola on peach and nectarine in China[J]. Plant Pathology, 2005, 54:375.
  • 6Sanoamuang N, Gaunt R E. Persistence and fitness of carbendazim-and dicarboximide resistant isolates of Monilinia frudicola (Wint.) Honey in floivers, shoots and fruit of stone fruit[J]. Plant Pathology, 1995, 44:448 - 457.
  • 7Lyr H L. Mechanism of action of dicarboximide fungicides In H. Lyr (ed.), Modern selective fungieides[J]. Fisher Verlag, Jena, 1987:75 - 89.
  • 8Elmer P A G, Gaunt R E. A survey of fungicide insensitivity in Monilinia fructicola[J]. Proceeding New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Conference, 1986, 39 :166 - 169.
  • 9Elmer P A G, Gaunt R E. The biological characteristics of dicarhoximide-resistant isolates of Monilinia fructicola from New Zealand stone-fruit orchards[J]. Plant Pathology, 1994, 43:130- 137.
  • 10Michailides T J, Ogawa J M, Opgenorth D C. Shift of Monilinia spp. and distribution of isolates sensitive and resistant to benomyl in California prune and apricot orchards[J].Plant Disease, 1987, 71 : 893 - 896.

共引文献40

同被引文献48

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部