期刊文献+

大学生自我妨碍及其与大五人格的关系研究 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究探究大学生的自我妨碍与人格特质之间的明确关系,采用Rhodewalt编制的"自我妨碍量表"(SHS)及McCrae和Costa编制的"简易大五人格量表"(NEO-FFI)对珠海某高校176名大学生(其中男生47人,女生129人)进行调查,研究发现:大学生自我妨碍与神经质呈显著正相关,与外倾性呈显著负相关,与宜人性呈显著负相关,与责任心呈显著负相关。神经质能够显著地正向预测大学生自我妨碍,责任心能够显著地负向预测大学生自我妨碍。这说明大学生人格特质能够很好地预测其自我妨碍。
出处 《学周刊(上旬)》 2013年第12期191-192,共2页 Learning Weekly
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献27

  • 1[1]Berglas S, Jones E E. Drug choice as a self - handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1978,36 (2): 405 - 417.
  • 2[2]Thompson T, Richardson A. Self- handicapping status, claimed self- handicapping and reduced practice effort following success and failure feedback[J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology,2001,71:151 - 170.
  • 3[3]Covington M V. Making the grade: A self- worth perspective on motivation and school reform[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  • 4[4]Luginbuhl J, Palmer R. Impression management aspects of self- handicapping: Positive and negative effects[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1991,17:655 - 662.
  • 5[5]Kolditz T. A, Arkin R M. An impression- management interpretation of the self- handicapping strategy[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982,43: 492 - 502.
  • 6[6]Hirt E R, McCrea S M, Boris H I. "I know you self- handicapped last exam": Gender differences in reactions to self - handicapping[J]. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology,2003, 84 ( 1 ): 177 - 193.
  • 7[7]Deppe R K, Harackiewicz J M. Self - handicapping and intrirsic motivation from the threat of failure[J] .Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996,70: 868 - 876.
  • 8[8]Zuckerman M, Kieffer S C, Knee C R. Consequences of self- handicapping: Effects on coping , academic performance and adjustment [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998,74: 1619 - 1628.
  • 9[9]Jones E E, Rhodewalt F. The self- handicapping Scale. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1982.
  • 10[10]Rhodwalt F. Self- handicapping: Individual differences in the preference for anticipatory, self- protective acts.In Higgins R L, Snyder C R, Berglas S. Self- handicapping: The paradox that isn't(pp. 69 - 106). New York:Plenum Press, 1990.

共引文献61

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部