摘要
日本的安乐死研究重视患者的"自我决定权",有轻视"经济负担"等外在社会利益因素的倾向。而我国恰恰与此相反,过于关注"社会医药资源的合理配置"等外在社会利益因素,缺乏对患者"自我决定权"这一内在因素的深入研究。其实,"自我决定"与"社会决定"分别是允许积极安乐死的必要条件而不是充分条件。用二选一的方法,舍弃其中的任何一个原理来建构安乐死合法论是行不通的。只有将"自我决定权"与"社会决定权"相结合,才能从刑法理论上顺利解决安乐死问题。只有当两者都符合时,积极安乐死才是合法的。
The Japanese euthanasia research emphasis on the patient＇ s ＂right of self - determination＂ and have a tend- ency to disregard external factors in the interests of the community such as ＂economic burden＂. While China is precisely contrary to this, too focuses on extrinsic factors in the interests of the community such as ＂rational allocation of social medi- cal resources＂, lack of in - depth study of the internal factor of the patients＇ ＂right of self - determination＂. Even though both ＂self-determination＂ and ＂social determination＂ are necessary conditions for administering active euthanasia, they are not sufficient. The ideal of active euthanasia should not be judged by opinions of only one side, either ＂self determina- tion＂ or ＂social determination＂. In fact, only the combination of the ＂ self- determination＂ and ＂social decision＂ to re- solve the issue of euthanasia smoothly from the criminal theory. Active euthanasia is only permitted when both conditions are perfectly balanced.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第5期62-71,共10页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
江苏省法学会课题(SFH2013D18)
东南大学高校基本科研业务费专项资金(3213053205)
关键词
安乐死
自我决定权
社会决定权
euthanasia
self - determination
social determination
