期刊文献+

实时信息下的乘客路径选择行为 被引量:5

Passenger route choice behavior on transit network with real-time information at stops
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 智能公交系统伴随着智能交通信息系统的发展而逐渐普及,其目的是向乘客提供各种实时交通信息,以提高出行的便利性和灵活性,最终实现公交出行分担率的提升。针对公交网络的特殊性,提出符合乘客路径选择行为且易于确定的广义路径定义,以成都公交电子站牌信息为背景,设计问卷对乘客路径选择行为及出行意向进行调查。采用定性和定量分析相结合的分析方法,基于随机效用理论,建立包括路径选择方案特性变量和乘客个人社会经济属性特性变量为解释变量的Logit和混合Logit路径选择模型,运用蒙特卡洛模拟和极大似然法完成参数估计。分析结果表明,混合Logit模型能更合理地解释由个体偏好而导致的路径选择行为差异,有助于对复杂公交行为的理解,以便更好地用以指导实践。 Along with the development of intelligent transportation information system, intelligent public transportation system is gradually popularized. Such information system is designed to provide all kinds of real-time information to transit passengers on the conditions of the network, and hence affect passengers' travel choice behavior and improve passenger travel convenience and flexibility, so as to improve the social benefit and service level of the public transit system. Concerning the particularity of the transit network, with electronic bus stop information of Chengdu as an example, a questionnaire was designed to investigate passengers' route choice behavior and travel intention. Qualitative and quantitative analysis and random utility theory were adopted, based on Logit model and mixed Logit model, route choice models were established, using characteristic variables of various options and passengers' personal socio-economic attributes as explanatory variables. The method of Monte Carlo simulation and maximum likelihood were used to estimate parameters. The results indicate that the differences of route choice behavior resulting from individual preferences can be reasonably interpreted by mixed Logit model, which helps us better understand the complexity of transit behavior, so as to guide the application.
出处 《计算机应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第10期2964-2968,共5页 journal of Computer Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71090402 71271178) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(12YJA630057)
关键词 实时电子站牌信息 路径选择 混合Logit模型 极大似然估计 蒙特卡洛模拟 real-time information at stops route choice mixed Logit model maximum likelihood estimation MonteCarlo simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1林震,杨浩.交通信息服务条件下的出行选择分析[J].中国公路学报,2003,16(1):87-90. 被引量:25
  • 2ATKINS S. Passenger information at bus stops: report on monitoring studies of route 18 demonstration [R]. London: Is. n], 1994.
  • 3DZIEKAN K, KOTTENHOFF K. Dynamic at-stop real-time infor- mation displays for public transport: effects on customers [ J].Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2007, 41 (6) : 489 - 501.
  • 4CAULFIELD B, O'MAHONY M. A stated preference analysis of re- al-time public transit stop information [ J]. Journal of Public Trans- portation, 2009, 12(3): 1-20.
  • 5HICKMAN M D, WILSON N H M. Passenger travel time and path choice implications of real-time transit information [ J]. Transporta- tion Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 1995, 3(4): 211 - 226.
  • 6CASSIDY S, WHITE P. Use and perceptions of a real time passen- ger information system [ J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 1995, 29(1): 27-39.
  • 7WATKINS K E, FERRIS B, BORNING A, et al. Where is my bus? impact of mobile real-time information on the perceived and ac- tual wait time of transit riders[ J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2011, 45(8) : 839 - 848.
  • 8GENTILE G, NGUYEN S, PALLOTYINO S. Route choice on tran- sit networks with online information at stops[ J]. Transportation Sci-ence, 2005, 39(3): 289 -297.
  • 9MISHALANI R G, McCORD M M, WIRTZ J. Passenger wait time perceptions at bus stops: empirical results and impact on evaluating real-time bus arrival information[ J]. Journal of Public Transporta- tion, 2006, 9(2): 89-106.
  • 10WAHBA M M A A L. MILATRAS: Microsimulation learning- based approach to transit assignment[ EB/OL]. [ 2013-01-10]. https://tspace, library, utoronto, ca/handle/1807/17251.

二级参考文献15

  • 1张天然,杨东援,叶亮,王权.应用Mixed Logit模型估计非同质旅行时间价值[J].交通与计算机,2007,25(3):55-58. 被引量:8
  • 2McFadden D, Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response[J].Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2000, 15(5) : 447 -470.
  • 3Mehndiratta S. Time-of-day effects in inter-city business travel [ D ]. Berkeley: University of California, 1996.
  • 4Hensher D, Greene W. The mixed logit model: The state of practice and warnings for the unwary [ J ]. Transportation, 2003, 30 (2) : 133 - 176.
  • 5Train K. A comparison of hierarchical Bayes and maximum simulated likelihood for mixed logit [ EB/OL].Berkeley : University of California, 2001 [ 2009 - 12 ]. http ://emlab. berkeley, edu/- train/compare. pdf.
  • 6Train K, Sonnier G. Mixed logit with bounded distributions of correlated partworths [ C ]//Searpa R, Alberini A: Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2005 : 117 - 134.
  • 7Train K. Discrete choice methods with simulation [M]. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • 8Morokoff W J, Caflisch R E. Quasi-random sequences and their discrepancies[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 1994, 15(6) : 1251 - 1279.
  • 9Hess S, Polak J W, Daly A. On the performance of the shuffled halton sequence in the estimation of discrete choice models[EB/OL]. Strasbourg: European Transport Conference, 2003 [ 2009 - 12 ]. http: // citeseerx, ist. psu. edu/viewdoc/download? doi = 10. 1.1.110. 3610&red = reol &type = pdf.
  • 10Hess S, Train K, Polak J. On the use of modified latin hypercube sampling (MLHS) method in the estimation of a mixed logit model for vehicle choice [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2006, 40(2): 147- 163.

共引文献69

同被引文献23

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部