期刊文献+

牡蛎壳人工礁对多毛纲底栖动物群落结构的影响 被引量:3

EFFECT OF ARTIFICIAL OYSTER SHELL REEF ON BENTHIC POLYCHAETA COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN RONGCHENG BAY,CHINA
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用功能群及多元统计方法,对山东荣成俚岛湾牡蛎壳人工增殖礁礁区与毗连非礁区底质中多毛纲动物群落结构进行对比研究,评估了牡蛎壳人工礁对多毛纲底栖动物群落结构的影响。结果表明,人工礁区与非礁区共采集19科39种多毛纲动物,按食性分为植食性、沉积食性和肉食性三大功能群。礁区肉食性多毛纲动物栖息密度高于非礁区,可能与人工礁礁体底栖多毛纲动物引起的边缘效应有关。多维尺度分析MDS、相似度分析ANOSIM以及多因素方差分析(PERMANOVA)结果表明,礁区同非礁区多毛纲动物群落结构差异不显著,这可能与牡蛎壳人工礁单体体积较小,对近底层水体及底质理化环境的影响较小有关。综上所述,牡蛎壳人工礁在较小时间尺度内(1—2年)对底栖环境无显著影响。 Polychaeta have been shown a good indicator to environmental changes. We investigated the functional group and community structure of Polychaeta in reef and non-reef area to study the ecological effects of artificial oyster shell reef. 19 families and 39 species of Polychaeta were sampled in two areas. The dominant species of Polychaeta communities were herbivore and deposit-feeders. The most abundance species in the two areas were Scoletoma longifolia, Chaetozone setosa, and Cirratulus filiformis. The abundance of carnivore species in reef area was higher than that in non-reef area, which might be resulted from the halo effects of oyster shell reef. The statistic results using multi-dimensional scaling (MDS), similarities multivariate analyses (ANOSIM), and PERMANOVA showed that the difference of Polychaeta communities in reef and non-reef areas was not significant, because the shell reef size was relatively small and slightly affected near-bottom water flow and sediment environment. The oyster shell reef had no significant effects on local benthic environment in a short time (1—2 year).
出处 《海洋与湖沼》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期1056-1061,共6页 Oceanologia Et Limnologia Sinica
基金 国家海洋公益性行业科研专项 201305043号 201205023号 国家自然科学基金项目 40906071号 南通市科技计划项目 HL2011018号 中国科学院院地合作项目 Y12319101L号
关键词 牡蛎壳人工礁 多毛纲动物 功能群 群落结构 artificial oyster shell reef Polychaeta functional group community structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

二级参考文献148

共引文献113

同被引文献78

  • 1詹启鹏,孙昕,董建宇,张宇洋,张秀梅.莱州芙蓉岛海域人工鱼礁附着生物的群落结构和功能性状[J].中国水产科学,2022,29(5):704-719. 被引量:5
  • 2林军,章守宇.人工鱼礁物理稳定性及其生态效应的研究进展[J].海洋渔业,2006,28(3):257-262. 被引量:89
  • 3Andersen A N, 1995. A classification of Australian ant communities, based on functional groups which parallel plant life-forms in relation to stress and disturbance. Journal of Biogeography, 22:15- 29.
  • 4Bonsdorff E, Norkko A, Sandberg E, 1995. Structuring zoobenthos:the importance of predation, cropping and physical disturbance. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 192:125-144.
  • 5Carvalho S, Pereira P, Pereira F, et al, 2011. Factors structuring temporal and spatial dynamics of macrobenthic communities in a eutrophic coastal lagoon (Obidos lagoon, Portugal). Marine Environmental Research, 71: 97-110.
  • 6Dimitriadis C, Evagelopoulos A, Koutsoubas D, 2012. Functional diversity and redundancy of soft bottom communities in brackish waters areas: local vs regional effects. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 426: 53-59.
  • 7Douglas J S, Mitsch W J, 2003. A model of macroinvertebrate trophie structure and oxygen demand in freshwater wetlands. Ecological Modelling. 161:183-194.
  • 8Engle V D, Summers J K, 1999. Latitudinal gradients in benthic commu- nity composition in western Atlantic estuaries. Journal of Biogeogra- phy, 26:1007 - 1023.
  • 9Fauehald K, Jumars P A, 1979. The diet of worms:A study of Polychaete feeding guilds. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 17: 193-284.
  • 10Gaudaneio M J, Cabral H N, 2007. Trophic structure of maerobenthos in the Tagus estuary and adjacent coastal shelf. Hydrobiologia, 587: 241-251.

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部