期刊文献+

普洱茶不同提取物体外抑菌活性研究 被引量:13

Antibacterial Activity of Pu’er Tea Extracts in Vitro
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究了不同溶剂普洱茶提取物及萃取物的体外抑菌活性。论文采用滤纸片扩散法和最低抑菌浓度检测了水提、75%和95%乙醇普洱茶提取物对S.aureus、E.coli、P.aeruginosa及B.subtilis体外抑菌效果。同时分析了95%醇提物的不同溶剂萃取物对供试菌的影响。结果表明:95%乙醇浸提物抑菌效果最好,尤其对S.aureus、E.coli最为明显,抑菌圈分别为19.58±0.24 mm、14.58±0.24 mm,MIC分别为0.63 mg/mL,0.39 mg/mL,但对B.subtilis抑菌效果差。在95%醇提物的不同溶剂萃取物中,萃取物抑菌活性为:乙酸乙酯>正丁醇>石油醚>氯仿。乙酸乙酯萃取物对S.aureus抑制效果最好,其抑菌圈直径为31.88±0.24 mm,MIC为0.47 mg/mL。普洱茶提取物的醇提乙酸乙酯萃取提物能显著抑制革兰氏阴性菌和阳性菌的生长,研究结果为普洱茶抗菌活性成分的开发利用提供一定的实践和数据参考。 The antibacterial activity of the solvent extracts fi'om Pu'er tea in vitro was studied in this paper. Filter paper disc diffusion method and minimal inhibition concentrations (MIC) were employed to determine the antibacterial activities of Pu'er tea extracts by water, 75% and 95% ethanol on S. aureus, E. coli, P aeruginosa and B. subtili s. The 95% ethanol extracts showed the highest antibacterial effect, especially to S. aureus and E. coli.with the inhibition radius being of 19.58 ~ 0.24 mm and 14.58 -4- 0.24 mm, respectively. The MIC was 0.63 mg/mL, 0.39 mg/mL. But 95% ethanol extracts showed little inhibitory effect on the growth of B. subtilis. The extracts obtained using different solvent showed different antibacterial effects, amont which the ethyl acetate extracts showed the strongest antibacterial activities, followed with the extracts of n-butyl alcohol, petroleum ether and chloroform. For different bacteria tested, the ethyl acetate extracts showed the strongest effects on the growth ofS. aureus with the inhibition zone diameter being of 31.88 ~ 0.24 mm and the MIC being of 0.473 mg/mL. The ethyl acetate extract of Pu'er tea could significantly inhibit the growth of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. This study provided the references for the development and utilization of antibacterial active ingredients from Pu'er tea.
出处 《现代食品科技》 EI CAS 北大核心 2013年第8期1770-1773,1765,共5页 Modern Food Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(31060270) 云南省自然科学基金(2011FZ091)
关键词 普洱茶 提取物 抑菌活性 最小抑菌浓度 Pu'er tea extract antibacterial activity minimal inhibition concentrations
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Chen Y S, Liu B L, Chang Y N. Bioactivities and sensory evaluation of Pu-erh teas made from three tea leaves in an improved pile fermentation process [J]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2010, 109(6): 557-563.
  • 2Zhang L, Ma Z Z, Che Y Y, et al. Protective effect of a new amide compound from Pu-erh tea on human micro-vascular endothelial cell against cytotoxicity induced by hydrogen peroxide [J]. Fitoterapia, 2011, 82(2): 267-271.
  • 3Abe M, Takaoke N, Idemoto Y, et al. Characteristic fungi observed in the fermentation process for Puer tea [J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2008, 124, (2): 199-203.
  • 4Kut K M, Kim J Y, Park H J, et al. Application of metabolomics in the analysis of manufacturing type of Pu-erh tea and composition changes with different postfermentation year [J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2010, 58(1): 345-352.
  • 5Xu X Q, Yan M C, Zhu Y. Influence of fungal fermentation on the development of volatile compounds in the Pu-erh tea manufacturing process [J]. Engineering in Life Sciences, 2005, 5(4): 382-386.
  • 6Wu S C, Yen G C, Wang B S. Antimutagenic and antimicrobialactivities of Pu-erh tea [J]. Food Science and Technology, 2007, 40(3): 506-512.
  • 7Hu Y J, Jia J J, Qiao J L, et al. Antimicrobial activity of pu-erh tea extracts in vitro and its effects on the preservation of cooled mutton [J]. Journal of Food Safety, 2010, 30(1): 177-195.
  • 8Lee H C, Jenner A M, Low C S, et al. Effect of tea phenolics and their aromatic fecal bacterial metabolites on intestinal microbiota [J]. Research in Microbiology, 2006, 157(9): 876-884.
  • 9Hu Y J, Qiao J L, Zhallg X, et al. Anfimicrobial activity of magnolia off~cinalis exlracts in vitro and its effects on the preservation of chilled mutton [J]. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 2011, 35(2): 425-441.
  • 10Sharma A, Gupta S, Sarethy I P, et al. Green tea extract:Possible mechanism and antibacterial activity on skin pathogens [J]. Food Chemistry, 2012, 135(2): 672-675.

同被引文献230

引证文献13

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部