慈善捐赠行为对企业品牌资产影响的实验研究被引量：3

An Experimental Study on the Effect of Corporate Philanthropy on Brand Equity

下载PDF

导出

摘要慈善捐赠行为对企业品牌资产的影响机理是一个理论难题,也是实务界关心的现实问题。本文采用实验研究方法,基于顾客的品牌资产理论认知,以大学生和高校后勤职工为对象,考察了不同类型慈善捐赠行为对企业品牌资产的影响,并分析了感知风险的调节作用。实验研究表明,"反应性-一般群体"类和"先行性-特定群体"类慈善捐赠行为能够提升品牌忠诚;四类慈善捐赠行为均对品牌知晓和品牌形象产生了正面影响;感知风险在慈善捐赠行为和企业品牌资产之间具有调节作用。 The effect mechanism of corporate philanthropy on brand equity is a theoretical problem, while companies pay more attention to it. Based on the theory of brand equity and the samples of university students and staffs of the university service company, this paper tests the effects of different types of corporate philanthropy on brand equity, and analyses the mediating effects of perceived risk between them. Experimental study shows, corporate philanthropy of Reactive - Gener- al and Proactive - Directed can improve brand loyalty; four types of corporate philanthropy have positive effect on brand awareness and brand image; perceived risk has mediating effect between corporate philanthropy and brand equity.

作者杨志坚薛永基

机构地区北京理工大学出版社北京林业大学经济管理学院

出处《商业研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第9期70-78,共9页 Commercial Research

基金教育部博士点基金项目"社会责任对企业品牌资产影响的机理与实证研究" 项目编号:20101101110035

关键词慈善捐赠行为品牌资产行为类型感知风险 corporate philanthropy brand equity behavioral types perceived risk

分类号 F274 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1Brown, T. 1. and Dacin, P. A. The company and the product: Corporate association and consumer product re?sponses[J].Journal of Marketing, 1997 ,61 :68 -84.
2Sen, Sankar, Bhattacharya. Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better - Consumer Reactions to Corpo?rate Social Responsibility[J].Journal of Marketing Research,2001 ,38(2) :225 -244.
3Jiyang Bae, Glen T. Cameron. Conditioning effect of prior reputation on perception of corporate giving[J] . Public Relations Review ,2006 ,32: 144 -150.
4Joe M. Ricks,Jr. the effects of strategic corporate phi?lanthropy on consumer perceptions: an experimental as?sessment[DJ. PHD dissertation, Louisiana State Uni?versity,2002.
5Lafferty, B. A. "Cause - related Marketing: Does the Cause Make a Difference in Consumers Attitudes and Purchase Intentions toward the Product?" Working pa?per ,Department of Marketing, florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 1996.
6McWilliams,A. and Siegel,D. Corporate social respon?sibility: a theory of the firm perspective[J] . Academy of Management Review,2001,26(1) :117 -127.
7Mohr, L. A. , Webb, D.J. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and Price on Consumer Responses[J] . TheJournal of Consumer Affairs. 2005 ( 39) : 121 -147.
8M. Palaz6n - Vidal, E. Delgado - Ballester. Sales Pro?motions Effects on Consumer - Based Brand Equity. In?ternationalJournal of Market - Research, 2005 ( 47 ) : 179 -246.
9Aaker, David A. Measuring Brand Equity Across Prod?ucts And Markets[J]. California Management Review, 1996,38 (3) :102 -120.
10Keller, K. L. Building Customer - Based Brand Equity[J] . Marketing Management, 200 1 , 10 ( 2) : 14 - 19.

二级参考文献23

1罗谷包峰 BruceEinhom MichaelArndt MichaelShari DavidKiley 董平.强大的中国名牌[J].商业周刊（中文版）,2004(12):16-20. 被引量：1
2何佳讯.品牌关系质量本土化模型的建立与验证[J].华东师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2006,38(3):100-106. 被引量：103
3张相文（译），品牌营销，1998年
4费者营销学报，1995年，4期
5营销研究学报，1995年，2期
6营销研究学报，1994年，5期
7Aaker,David A.Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets[J].California Management Review,1996,38 (3).
8Batra,Rajeev.Marketing Issues and Challenges in Transtional Economies[J].Journal of International Marketing,1997,5 (4).
9Clarke Ⅲ,Irvine,Kathleen S.Micken,and H.Stanley Hart.Symbols for Saleat Least for Now:Symbolic Consumption in Transition Economies[J].Advances in Consumer Research,2002,(29).
10Fournier,Susan.A Consumer-brand Relationship Framework for Strategic Brand Management[D].Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,University of Florida,1994.