期刊文献+

心理干预在非小细胞肺癌患者首次化疗过程中的效果分析 被引量:4

Analysis of the Effect of Psychological Intervention Applied in the First Course of Chemotherapy for 94 Cases of Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:观察心理干预在非小细胞肺癌患者首次化疗中的应用效果.方法:随机抽取2009年5月至2013年5月期间我院收治的非小细胞肺癌确诊患者94例,PS评分均为0分~1分,1:1随机分为干预组与对照组,所有患者化疗方案均为吉西他滨+顺铂,干预组患者增加心理干预,分别在治疗前和治疗后对患者进行SAS以及SDS评分,并在治疗后对患者生活质量进行评分.结果:治疗前两组患者的平均SAS及SDS评分差异无统计学(P>0.05),干预组患者治疗后的平均SAS评分为(22.19 +7.84),明显低于治疗前(42.06±10.74),差异有统计学意义(t=22.511,P<0.05),对照组的平均SAS评分为(41.76±9.58),与治疗前(45.59±14.62)相比差异无统计学,两组比较干预组的平均SAS评分明显低于对照组(t=11.946,P<0.05);干预组治疗后的平均SDS评分为(25.49±6.12),明显低于治疗前(46.15±13.84),差异有统计学意义(t=26.490,P<0.05);对照组的平均SDS评分为(43.72±14.67),与治疗前相比无统计学差异,组间比较干预组的平均SDS评分明显低于对照组(t=20.818,P<0.05).干预组患者首次化疗结束后进行生活质量评分得分为4-5分的明显高于对照组(x2=29.716,P<0.05),差异具有统计学意义.结论:在非小细胞肺癌患者首次进行化疗的过程中进行心理干预可有效提高其治疗后的生活质量,值得临床推广. Objective: To observe the effect of psychological intervention applied in the first course of chemotherapy for pa- tients with non-small cell lung cancer. Methods : Ninety-four cases of non-small lung cancer treated in our hospital with PS score of 0 - 1 from May 2009 to May 2013 were included in our study. Forty-seven cases were selected in intervention group, and 47 cases in control group. All of them were given the chemotherapy regimen of Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin, and psychological intervention was add- ed in intervention group. Modified SAS and SDS scores were evaluated before and after treatment, and quality of life was graded after treatment. Results: There was no statistically significant difference of mean modified SAS and SDS scores between the two groups he- fore treatment( P 〉 0.05 ). After treatment, mean modified SAS score in intervention group was (22. 19 +-7.84), which was much low- er than that before treatment (42. 06 ~ 10. 74,t =22. 511, P 〈0. 05), and mean modified SAS score in control group was(41.76 _+ 9. 58 ) , which had no statistically significant difference with that before treatment(45.59 -+ 14. 62 ) , and mean modified SAS score in intervention group was lower than that in control group ( t = 11. 946, P 〈 0. 05 ). Mean modified SDS score in intervention group was (25.49 +6. 12), which was much lower than that before treatment (t =26. 490, P 〈0. 05), and mean modified SDS score in control group was(43.72 -+ 14. 67 ), which had no statistically significant difference with that before treatment, and mean modified SDS score in intervention group was lower than that in control group ( t =20. 818, P 〈0. 05). The cases with score of quality of life from 4 to 5 were more in intervention group than that that in control group (X2 = 29. 716, P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion: Quality of life of patients with non-small cell lung cancer after treatment could be effectively improved by psychological intervention added in at the first course of chemotherapy. It is worthy of clinical application.
出处 《肿瘤预防与治疗》 2013年第4期226-228,250,共4页 Journal of Cancer Control And Treatment
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 吉西他滨 顺铂 心理干预 生活质量 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Gemcitabine Cisplatin Psychological Intervention Quality of Life
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Charles C,Sultan S,Bungener C,et al.Impact of cutaneous toxicities associated with targeted therapies on quality of life.Results of a longitudinal exploratory study[J].Bull Cancer,2013,100(3):213-222.
  • 2Yun YH,Shon E J,Yang AJ,et al.Needs regarding care and factors associated with unmet needs in disease-free survivors of surgically treated lung cancer[J].Ann Oncol,2013,24 (6):1552-1559.
  • 3Kerjouan M,Jouneau S,Corre R.Diagnosis and management of lung cancer during pregnancy[J].Rev Mal Respir,2013,30(2):125-136.
  • 4Irwin KE,Greer JA,Khatib J,et al.Early palliative care and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer:potential mechanisms of prolonged survival[J].Chron Respir Dis,2013,10(1):35-47.
  • 5Koczywas M,Williams AC,Cristea M.Longitudinal changes in function,symptom burden,and quality of life in patients with early-stage lung cancer[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2013,20 (6):1788-1797.
  • 6Nasseri K,Mills PK,Mirshahidi HR.Suicide in cancer patients in California,1997-2006[J].Arch Suicide Res,2012,16 (4):324-333.
  • 7黄杰,赵翠,陈晓燕.心理干预对肺癌化疗患者负性情绪及生存质量的影响[J].山东医药,2010,50(21):50-51. 被引量:16
  • 8Walker J,Sawhney A,Hansen CH,et al.Treatment of depression in people with lung cancer:a systematic review[J].Lung Cancer,2013,79(1):46-53.

二级参考文献3

  • 1Alexander DJ.A review of avian influenza indifferent bird species[J].Vet Microbiol,2000,22(1-2):3-13.
  • 2孙燕 周际昌.临床肿瘤内科手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.586-591.
  • 3王建平,林文娟,梁耀坚,蔺秀云.心理干预对癌症患者免疫功能的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床,2002,29(12):841-844. 被引量:54

共引文献15

同被引文献55

  • 1易雪,刘爽,李滨,朱明洪,易继权.心理治疗在恶性肿瘤治疗中的临床研究[J].中国实用医药,2006,1(2):14-16. 被引量:3
  • 2陈德钧.吸烟与人体健康[J].环境保护,1986,14(10):21-26. 被引量:1
  • 3李辉.睾丸肿瘤病人社会支持和生活质量相关性研究[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,2006,20(3):223-224. 被引量:1
  • 4柯纪定,刘海峰,严培玲,魏晓晶.肿瘤患者家属焦虑和抑郁状况调查[J].中国公共卫生,2007,23(8):941-943. 被引量:21
  • 5Hong JS, Tian J. Prevalence of anxiety and depression and their risk factors in Chinese cancer patients[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2014, 22(2) :453 -459.
  • 6Buchmann L, Conlee J, Hunt J, et al. Psychosocial distress is prevalent in head and neck cancer patients [ J]. Laryngoscope, 2013, 123(6) :1424 - 1429.
  • 7Korstjens I, Mesters I, van der Peer E, et al. Quality of life of cancer survivors after physical and psychosocial rehabilitation [ J ]. Eur J Cancer Prey, 2006,15 (6) : 541 - 547.
  • 8Mac Bride MB, Neat L, Dilavefi CA, et at. Factors associated with surgical decision making in women with early - stage breast cancer : a literature review [ J ]. J Womens Health (Larchmt) , 2013,22(3) :236 -242.
  • 9Jones RA, Steeves R, Williams I. Family and friend interactions a- mong African-American men deciding whether or not to have a pros- tate cancer-screening [J]. Urol Nurs, 2010,30(3) :189 -193.
  • 10赵木Jr』.肿瘤患者及家属、医护人员及医院管理者对临终关怀的态度及影响因素分析[D].长沙:中南大学,2012:16-19.

引证文献4

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部