期刊文献+

美国参与中亚事务的主要途径及其效果研究 被引量:4

Main Approaches for American Participation in Central Asian Affairs and Their Effectiveness
原文传递
导出
摘要 在介入中亚事务的过程中,美国倚重的是双边途径而不是多边合作。除了北约和平伙伴关系计划和西方主导的国际金融机构,美国既未做出真正的努力支持中亚国家组建的地区性合作机制,也没有创建包括美国和中亚国家在内的新合作机制。除了避免受到多边机制的牵制,美国致力于在中亚地区削弱俄罗斯的影响,是其倚重双边途径的主要原因。美国对双边途径的倚重给中亚地区带来了严重的负面影响,包括恶化了中亚国家之间的关系,并激化了大国尤其是俄罗斯与美国在中亚地区的竞争。这些负面影响不利于中亚地区局势的稳定,也间接地损害了美国在中亚地区所追求的战略目标。 In the course of its involvement in Central Asian affairs,America has preferred heavy reliance on bilateral mechanisms in favor of multilateral cooperation.Except for the NATO Partnership for Peace Programme and Western lead international financial organizations,America has not made any genuine efforts to support Central Asian states in establishing regional cooperation mechanisms,nor has it established any new cooperative mechanisms between the U.S.and Central Asian states.In addition to avoiding involvement in multi-lateral regimes in the region,America has also sought to weaken Russian influence in Central Asia.This is the main reason why the U.S.has preferred bi-lateral cooperation in the region.American preference for bi-lateral cooperation has had serious negative impacts for Central Asia,including worsening relations between Central Asian states,and intensifying competition between great powers in the region,particularly Russia and the U.S.It also has negative effects on regional stability in Central Asia,and indirectly damages America's own strategic objectives in the region.
作者 曾向红
出处 《当代亚太》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期54-84,155-156,共31页 Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(项目批准号:06JZD0012) 兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(项目编号:10LZUJBWZY077) 兰州大学重点研究基地团队建设项目(项目批准号:13LZUJBWTD012)的阶段性成果
关键词 美国中亚政策 双边途径 多边机制 美俄关系 America's Policy towards Central Asia Bilateral Approaches Multilateral Mechanisms U.S.-Russia Relations
  • 相关文献

参考文献102

  • 1Matteo Fumagalli, "The United States andCentral Asia", in Emilian Kavalski, ed. , The New Central Asia : The Regional Impact of lnternation al Actors, New Jersey and London: World Scientific Publishing, 2010, p. 177.
  • 2MichaelMihalka, "Not Much of a Game: Security Dynamics in Central Asia", China and Eurasia Forum Quar- terly, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2007, p. 21.
  • 3Zbigniew Brzeinski, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, New York: Basic Books, 1997, p. 123.
  • 4Niklas L.P. SwanstrOm, Svante E. Cornell and Anara Tabyshalieva, A Conflict and Security Analysis of Central Asia with a Focus on Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, Washington, D.C. : The Central Asia-Caucasus Institute of Johns Hop kins University, 2001, p. 4.
  • 5Ariel Cohen, "U. S. Interests and Central Asia Energy Security", Back- grounder, No. 1984, November 15, 2006, 13. 1.
  • 6杜幼康.美国的南亚与中亚“整合”战略剖析[J].现代国际关系,2007(4):16-21. 被引量:9
  • 7赵华胜.美国新丝绸之路战略探析[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,33(6):15-24. 被引量:63
  • 8Robert M. Cutler, "US-Russian Strategic Relations and the Structuration of Central Asia", Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, Vol. 6, 2007, p. 125.
  • 9S. Neil MacFarlane, "The United States and Regionalism in Central Asia", International Af- fairs, Vo[. 80, No. 3, 2004, pp. 447-461.
  • 10S. Neil MaeFarlane, "The United States and Regionalism in Central Asia", p. 461.

二级参考文献205

共引文献99

同被引文献40

引证文献4

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部