期刊文献+

Quantifying the emission's impact of coal mining activities on the environment and human health in process 被引量:2

Quantifying the emission's impact of coal mining activities on the environment and human health in process
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Discharges and emissions in the coal mining process have a strong effect both on the environment and on human health. This problem is usually be a negative one and has only been recognized qualitatively, due to the lack of effective quantitative methods. Based on emergy theory and accounting methodology, a set of quantitative methods for accounting the environmental support due to pollutants emissions was first introduced. Then impacts on environment and effects on human health were quantified using the unified units. The results indicated that water pollutants caused more impacts on the environment than air pollutants did, i.e., more environmental contributions are needed to dilute and absorb water pollutants. The occupation of land caused by coal mining gangue waste stacking has led to a huge loss of environmental services over the years. Moreover, the potential damage on the human condition health caused by CO2 through climate change cannot be ignored. Finally, the impacts of mining activities on environmental and human health in unified units are shown to provide a quantitative insight into the disadvantage of coal mining. The comparable results of the method indicate the different influence of various pollutants and the contribution of 'natural capital' directly. This work is a part of ongoing thermodynamic input-output analysis and life cycle analysis of coal mining systems (which are in process.)
出处 《Journal of Coal Science & Engineering(China)》 2013年第3期421-426,共6页 煤炭学报(英文版)
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41101560)
关键词 emergy accounting pollutants emission environmental support coal mining 污染物排放量 环境支持 煤炭开采 人体健康 活动过程 量化 人类健康 生命周期分析
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Azapagic A, 2004. Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals in- dustry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12 (6): 639-662.
  • 2Goedkoop M, Spriensma R, 1999. The Eco-indicator 99: a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment, methodology report. PR6 Consultants b.v., Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
  • 3Hall C A S, 1995. Maximum power: The idea and applications of H. T. Odum. Niwot: University of Colorado Press.
  • 4Hau J L, Bakshi B R, 2004. Expanding exergy analysis to ac- count for ecosystem products and services. Environmental Science & Technology, 38 (13): 3768 3777.
  • 5Krajnc D, Glavic P, 2005. A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Resources, Conservation and Recyling, 43(2): 189 208.
  • 6Lan S F, Qin Pei, Lu H F, 2001. Emergy analysis of ecoeconomic systems. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press.
  • 7Odum H T, 1983. Systems ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • 8Odum H T, 1996. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and En- vironmental Decision Making. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • 9Odum H T, 2000. Handbook of emergy evaluation (Folio #2): emergy of global processes. Gainesville: University of Florida, Center for Environmental Policy Environmental Engineering Sciences. Available online: .http://www.epa. gov/aed/html/collaboration/emergycourse/presentations/F olio2.pdf [2009-04-03].
  • 10Ukidwe N U, Bakshi B R, 2004. Thermodynamic Accounting of Ecosystem Contribution to Economic Sectors with Ap- plication to 1992 US Economy. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(18): 4810-4827.

同被引文献31

引证文献2

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部