期刊文献+

科技论文中基金项目多重标注归因分析及对策研究 被引量:5

Attribution Analysis and Countermeasures on Multiple Fund Marked of Sci-tech Papers
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 科技论文中的基金项目标注对于项目成果评价、绩效评估具有重要的意义。目前,由于种类多样、管理部门分散的基金项目资助体系以及基金论文比进入期刊评价指标等原因,单篇论文受多个基金重复资助现象严重。此现象是基金项目资助体系和期刊评价指标体系共同作用的结果。故应进一步加强各类基金资助机构之间的信息共享,有效提高对同一项目多头申请经费的审核;增加对项目标注信息真实性和相关性的审查;加强对科研工作者学术规范的教育引导,提高科研工作者、管理者及相关人员的学术道德修养,从根本上杜绝基金项目成果标注中的学术不端现象。 In Science and Technology papers, marks of fund projects are very crucial for the as- sessment of projects achievement and performance. Nowadays, under the following reasons such as various classifications of papers, loosely-managed fund projects sponsoring system, and also the pro- portion of fund-sponsored papers becoming the index for journal assessment, the phenomenon of a single same paper being sponsored by several funds repeatedly is becoming serious. This phenomenon is due to the co-effect of the fund sponsoring system as well as the journals assessment index system. Therefore, we need to strengthen the information communication among fund sponsoring organiza- tions, effectively improve the audit of the same project applying for multiple funds, pay more atten- tion to the audit of the authenticity of project mark information, promote academic discipline among scientific research workers, and improve academic moral standards for scientific research workers and relative management workers, eventually eliminating the academic misconduct of marked achieve- ments for fund projects.
作者 苗亚静
出处 《宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版)》 2013年第4期109-112,共4页 Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences:Social Science Edition
关键词 基金项目 成果标注 科技论文 学术规范 教育引导 fund project marked achievement Sci--tech paper academic discipline academic guidance
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献33

共引文献69

同被引文献41

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部