摘要
目的比较开放手术与微创经皮肾穿刺取石术治疗肾结石的临床疗效。方法选择本院收治的肾结石患者98例,并随机分为观察组和对照组,每组49例。观察组给予微创经皮肾穿刺取石手术治疗,对照组给予开放式手术治疗,比较2组的临床疗效。结果手术后,观察组手术时间、术中出血量、切口大小、结石清除率、术后住院时间、下床活动时间以及术后排气时间等指标均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用微创经皮肾穿刺取石术治疗肾结石患者疗效确切,手术创伤小,术后恢复快,有利于患者术后病情的早期恢复,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the clinical effect of open surgery and MPCNL in the treatment of kidney stones. Methods Ninety - eight patients with kidney stones were selected, and were divided into observation group and control group, 49 cases in each. The observation group received minimally percutaneous nephrolithotomy stone removal surgical treatment and the control group received open surgical treatment. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. Resuits After surgery, the operating time, blood loss, incision size, stone clearancerate, postoperative hospital stay, ambulation, and flatus time and other indicators of the observation group were markedly better than those of the control group, the difference being statistically significant （P 〈 0. 05）. Conclusion The minimally percutaneous lithotripsy efficacy for patients with kidney stones is superior to open surgery, which is good for early recovery, and it is worthy of wider promotion and application.
出处
《实用临床医药杂志》
CAS
2013年第15期45-46,50,共3页
Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
关键词
开放手术
微创经皮肾穿刺取石术
肾结石
疗效
open surgery
minimally invasive percutaneous renal puncture
kidney stones
clinical effect
