期刊文献+

交易成本与农户农产品销售渠道选择——来自7省124村苹果种植户的经验证据 被引量:31

Transaction Costs and Farmers' Choice of Marketing Channels in China——Empirical Evidence from Apple Planters of 124 Villages from 7 Provinces
原文传递
导出
摘要 利用有序Probit模型和7个苹果主产省124个村苹果种植户的抽样调查数据,实证分析了交易成本对农户农产品销售渠道选择的影响。研究表明,交易成本对农户销售渠道选择有显著影响。表征信息成本的与购买者联系方式和市场信息来源对农户销售渠道选择有负向影响,表征谈判成本的是否签订生产合同和运输任务由谁来承担对农户销售渠道选择有负向影响,执行成本对农户的销售渠道选择有显著影响,尤其是结算方式和违约情况是农户销售渠道选择考虑的重要因素。因此,政府应当加强农村信息产品供给,鼓励不同形式的市场主体参与农产品流通体系建设,以降低交易成本,减少农产品流通过程中的"摩擦力"。 This research makes an empirical analysis of the impact of transaction costs on Chinese farmer's choice of marketing chan- nels with Ordered Probit Model and the data from 124 villages' apple planters from 7 provinces. The results suggest that, transaction cost has a significant effect on farmers' marketing choice. Information cost, represented by the way of connecting with buyers and market infor- mation resource has a negative impact on farmers' choice. Negotiation cost, characterized by whether sign a paper contract and transporta- tion holders has negative effect. Implementation cost, especially the settlement and infringement are the main factors considered by farmers when selling. Therefore, the government may need to enhance rural information supply and encourage various market organizations compete in the farm products circulation system, aiming at reduce the transaction cost, a friction in market.
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第7期56-64,共9页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"交易成本对农户农产品销售行为的影响及专业化组织创新研究"(70973098) "农产品供应链质量规制研究--基于利益主体的契约选择及其治理视角"(71203181) 国家现代农业产业技术建设项目(CARS-28) 教育部人文社会科学专项项目"农超对接"情景中的农产品质量规制研究"基于利益主体契约关系选择及其治理视角"(12YJC790117) 西北农林科技大学人文社科专项项目"中国供应链体系的食品安全管理研究"(2011RWZX01)
关键词 交易成本 农产品销售渠道 有序PROBIT模型 transaction cost farming household market channel Ordered Probit model
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Coase R R.The nature of the firmj Lj.Economica, 1994,4(11): 386-405.
  • 2Williamson 0 E.Comparative Economic Organization: The analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives[J].Administration Science Quaterly, 1991,36:269-296.
  • 3Cheung S N S.The Contractual Nature of the firmJ J].Journal of Law and Economics, 1983, 26( 1) : 493-517.
  • 4John Groenewegen.Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond[MJ.Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
  • 5Sadoulet E,Fukui S,Janvry A.Efficient Share Tenancy Contracts under risk: The Case of Two Rice-growing Villages in Thailand[J].Journal of Development Economics, 1995( 4 ):225-243.
  • 6Nigel Key,Elisabeth Sadoulet,Alain deJanvry.Transactions Costs and Household Supply Response[J].AmericanJournal of Agricultural Economics, 2000, 82( 2) : 245.
  • 7Marc F Bellemare', Christopher B Barrett.An ordered Model of Participation: 'Evidence from Kenya and EthiopialJ J .AmericanJournal of Agricultural Economics, 2006,88(2):324-337.
  • 8JohnJagwe.Charles Machethe and Emily Ouma:Transaction Costs and Smallholder Famers ' Participation in Banana Markets in the Great Lakes Region of Burundi, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo[J].The AfricanJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,2010,6( 1) :87-107.
  • 9Hiroyuki Takeshima,Alex Winter-Nelson.Sales Location and Supply Response among Semisubsitence Farmers in Benin: A Heteroskedastic Double Selection Model[ZJ. IFRRI Discussion Paper 00999,2010.
  • 10Nicholas Minot.Effect of Transaction Costs on Supply Response and Marketed Simulations Using Non-separable Household Models[Z].MSSD Discussion Paper No.36, 1999.

二级参考文献87

共引文献160

同被引文献397

引证文献31

二级引证文献247

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部