期刊文献+

不同青霉素治疗妊娠梅毒患者的妊娠不良结局及随诊情况 被引量:7

An analysis of adverse pregnancy outcome and follow-up among pregnant women with syphilis treated with penicillin
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨普鲁卡因青霉素与苄星青霉素治疗妊娠梅毒患者的妊娠结局不良率及随诊率有无差异。方法收集2009年3月至2011年3月门诊159例妊娠梅毒患者,根据患者处理方式的不同,分组进行比较。结果 A组为普鲁卡因青霉素治疗组,有效病例53例,普鲁卡因青霉素80万单位肌肉注射,每日1次,连续15日;B组为苄星青霉素治疗组,有效病例75例,苄星青霉素240万单位肌肉注射,每周1次,连续3周;C组为未治疗组,有效病例9例,D组为快速血浆反应素环状卡片试验(RPR)及梅毒螺旋体血球凝集试验(TPHA)均阴性的正常孕妇159例。A、B、C、D组妊娠结局异常率分别为18.87%(10/53)、17.33%(13/75)、66.67%(6/9)、15.72%(25/159),C、D组间,A、C组间,B、C组间差异均有统计学意义;A、D组间,B、D组间,A、B组间,差异均无统计学意义。A、B组随诊率分别为76.81%、92.59%,两组间随诊率差异有统计学意义。结论未治疗组妊娠梅毒的妊娠结局不良率远高于治疗组及正常孕妇组,治疗组的妊娠结局不良率与正常孕妇组无明显差异,且2种青霉素治疗组间无明显差异,但2治疗组间随诊率有差异。 Objective To investigate the adverse pregnancy outcome and follow-up rate among pregnant women with syphilis treated with procaine penicillin and benzathine penicillin.Methods One hundred and fifty nine pregnant women with syphilis visiting outpatient departments from March 2009 to March 2011 were surveyed and were divided into different groups according to different methods of handling.Results Group A included 53 significant cases treated with procaine penicillin,80 thousand units,intramuscular injection,once daily,for 15 days;Group B included 75 significant cases treated with benzathine penicillin,240 thousand units,two sides of gluteal muscle injection,once a week,for three weeks;Group C included nine cases who had not received any treatment;Group D included 159 normal pregnant women,whose rapid plasma reagin(RPR) and treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay(TPHA) were negative.The rates of abnormal pregnancy outcomes of A,B,C,D groups were 18.87%,17.33%,66.67%,15.72%,respectively.The differences between groups C and D,groups A and C,groups B and C had statistical significance.The differences between groups A and D,groups B and D,groups A and B had no statistical significance.Follow-up rates in groups A and B were 76.81% and 92.59%,respectively;the difference between the two groups had statistical significance.Conclusion The adverse pregnancy outcome in the non-treatment group is far higher than in the treatment group and the group of normal pregnant women.The adverse pregnancy outcomes in the treatment group and the group of normal pregnant women have no significant difference,and two kinds of penicillin in the treatment group show no significant differences between the two treatment groups,but the follow-up rate has difference.
出处 《中国艾滋病性病》 CAS 2013年第6期438-440,共3页 Chinese Journal of Aids & STD
关键词 青霉素 妊娠梅毒 妊娠结局 随诊率 Penicillin Syphilis in pregnancy Pregnancy outcome Follow-up rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1彭石潜,张荣,黄志明,洪福昌,熊礼宽,周华.荧光定量PCR检测梅毒孕妇引产胎盘脐带组织中的梅毒螺旋体[J].岭南皮肤性病科杂志,2004,11(3):221-223. 被引量:1
  • 2姜仁惠 袁阳.苄星青霉素治疗早期梅毒30例[J].中华皮肤科杂志,1996,29:205-205.
  • 3赵辨.临床皮肤病学[M](第2版)[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1998.538-557.
  • 4Centers for Disease Control. Guidelines for the prevention and control of congenital syphilis [J]. MMWR, 1989, 37 (s1): 1-13.
  • 5Alexander JM, Sheffield JS, Sanchez PJ, et al. Efficacy of treatmere for syphilis in pregnancy [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1999, 93(1): 5-8.
  • 6JS Sheffield, PJ Sanchez, G Morris, et al. congenital syphilis after matermal treatment for syphilis during pregnancy[J]. Am J Obstet gynecol, 2002, 186: 569-573.
  • 7Borisenko kk,Tichonoval LI,Renton AM,et al. Syphilis and oter sexually transmitted infections in the Russian Federation[J].Int J STD AIDS,1999,10(10):665-668.
  • 8SG Paryani,AJ Vaughn,M Crosby ,et al. Treatment of asymptomatic congenital syphilis: benzathine versus procaine penicillin G therapy[J].J Pediatr,1994,125(3):471-475.
  • 9Schmid GP.Serologic screening for syphilis.Rationale,cost,and realpolitik[J].Sex Transm Dis,1996,23:45 -50.
  • 10Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.1998 Guidelines for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases[J].MMWR,1998,47 (NO RR -1):28-40.

共引文献133

同被引文献67

  • 1朱慧兰,谷进,苏向阳,赖维.妊娠梅毒孕期内和妊娠前抗梅毒治疗对分娩结果的影响[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2006,27(2):200-202. 被引量:13
  • 2邓庆珊,温济英,何秋婉,邓群娣.妊娠期抗梅毒治疗对胎婴儿的影响[J].中国基层医药,2006,13(5):846-847. 被引量:3
  • 3ChenXS,PeelingRW,YinYP,etal.Improvingantenatalcaretopreventadversep-regnancyoutomescausedbysyphilis[J].FutureMicm-bio,2011,6(10):1131-1134.
  • 4HongFC,LiuJB,FengTJ,etal.Congenitalsyphilis:aneconmicel-uationofapreventionprogram inChina[J].SexTransm Dis,2010,37(1):26-31.
  • 5ZhuL,QinM,DuL,etal.Maternalandcongenital.syphilisinShanghai,China,2002to2006[J].IntJInfectDis,2010,14(Suppl3):45-48.
  • 6Saje A, Tomafi~ J. Syphilis and HIV co - infection: excellent re- sponse to multiple doses of benzathine penicillin. Acta dermatovener- ologica Alpina, 2014,23( 1 ) :1 -3.
  • 7Rajaram SP, Banandur P, Thammattor UK, et al. Two cross -sec- tional studies in south India assessing the effect of an HIV prevention programme for female sex workers on reducing syphilis among their clients. Sexually transmitted infections, 2014,90 (7) :556 -562.
  • 8Clement ME, Hicks CB. RPR and the serologic diagnosis of syphilis. .lAMA ,2014,312 (18) : 1922 - 1923.
  • 9Perry M, Iveson H, White J. Assessment of the performance of a rap- id point of care syphilis test in a London genitourinary medicine clin- ic. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 2014,25 ( 13 ) :967 -968.
  • 10Manr~quez J, Andino - Navarrete R, Andrighetti C. Skin rash, dysp- nea and bone pain: secondary syphilis. The Brazilian Journal of Infec- tious Diseases,2015,19 ( 1 ) :96 -97.

引证文献7

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部