期刊文献+

Electronic phase diagram of NaFe_(1-x)Co_xAs investigated by scanning tunneling microscopy

Electronic phase diagram of NaFe_(1-x) Co_xAs investigated by scanning tunneling microscopy
原文传递
导出
摘要 Our recent scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) studies of the NaFelxCoxAs phase diagram over a wide range of dopings and temperatures are reviewed. Similar to the high-Tc cuprates, the iron-based superconductors lie in close proximity to a magnetically ordered phase. Therefore, it is widely believed that magnetic interactions or fluctuations play an important role in triggering their Cooper pairings. Among the key issues regarding the electronic phase diagram are the properties of the parent spin density wave (SDW) phase and the superconducting (SC) phase, as well as the interplay between them. The NaFe l-xCoxAs is an ideal system for resolving these issues due to its rich electronic phases and the charge-neutral cleaved surface. In our recent work, we directly observed the SDW gap in the parent state, and it exhibits unconventional features that are incompatible with the simple Fermi surface nesting picture. The optimally doped sample has a single SC gap, but in the underdoped regime we directly viewed the microscopic coexistence of the SDW and SC orders, which compete with each other. In the overdoped regime we observed a novel pseudogap-like feature that coexists with supercon- ductivity in the ground state, persists well into the normal state, and shows great spatial variations. The rich electronic structures across the phase diagram of NaFel_xCoxAs revealed here shed important new light for defining microscopic models of the iron-based superconductors. In particular, we argue that both the itinerant electrons and local moments should be considered on an equal footing in a realistic model. Our recent scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) studies of the NaFelxCoxAs phase diagram over a wide range of dopings and temperatures are reviewed. Similar to the high-Tc cuprates, the iron-based superconductors lie in close proximity to a magnetically ordered phase. Therefore, it is widely believed that magnetic interactions or fluctuations play an important role in triggering their Cooper pairings. Among the key issues regarding the electronic phase diagram are the properties of the parent spin density wave (SDW) phase and the superconducting (SC) phase, as well as the interplay between them. The NaFe l-xCoxAs is an ideal system for resolving these issues due to its rich electronic phases and the charge-neutral cleaved surface. In our recent work, we directly observed the SDW gap in the parent state, and it exhibits unconventional features that are incompatible with the simple Fermi surface nesting picture. The optimally doped sample has a single SC gap, but in the underdoped regime we directly viewed the microscopic coexistence of the SDW and SC orders, which compete with each other. In the overdoped regime we observed a novel pseudogap-like feature that coexists with supercon- ductivity in the ground state, persists well into the normal state, and shows great spatial variations. The rich electronic structures across the phase diagram of NaFel_xCoxAs revealed here shed important new light for defining microscopic models of the iron-based superconductors. In particular, we argue that both the itinerant electrons and local moments should be considered on an equal footing in a realistic model.
出处 《Chinese Physics B》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2013年第8期171-180,共10页 中国物理B(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Basic Research Program of China(Grant Nos.2009CB929400 and 2010CB923003)
关键词 iron-based superconductor scanning tunneling microscopy spin-density wave SUPERCONDUCTIVITY iron-based superconductor, scanning tunneling microscopy, spin-density wave, superconductivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1Kamihara Y, Watanabe T, Hirano M and Hosono H 2008 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 3296.
  • 2Chubukov A V, Efremov D V and Eremin I 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 134512.
  • 3Mazin I I, Singh D J, Johannes M D and Du M H 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 057003.
  • 4Si Q M and Abrahams E 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 076401.
  • 5Seo K J, Bernevig B A and Hu J P 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 206404.
  • 6Wang F, Zhai H, Ran Y, Vishwanath A and Lee D H 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 047005.
  • 7de la Cruz C, Huang Q, Lynn J W, Li J Y, Ratcliff W, Zarestky J L, Mook H A, Chen G F, Luo J L, Wang N L and Dai P C 2008 Nature 453 899.
  • 8Dong J, Zhang H J, Xu G, Li Z, Li G, Hu W Z, Wu D, Chen G F, Dai X, Luo J L, Fang Z and Wang N L 2008 Europhys. Lett. 83 27006.
  • 9Haule K and Kotliar G 2009 New J. Phys. 11 025021.
  • 10Zhou X D, Cai P, Wang A F, Ruan W, Ye C, Chen X H, You Y Z, Weng Z Y and Wang Y Y 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 037002.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部