摘要
目的:对急诊患者不同插管方式的应用效果进行比较。方法:我院收治急诊患者40例,根据患者气管的插管方式不同而分为D、C两组,通过口部进行气管插管的患者20例(D组),通过鼻腔进行气管插管20例(C组)。对两组患者的插管时间、维持时间的长短、导管管径、导管固定情况、患者耐受性以及出现的并发症进行比较。结果:两组数据进行比较,此间数据的差异具有统计学意义。结论:通过口部以及通过鼻腔进行气管插管有各自的优缺点,因此在进行急诊的过程中应根据患者体现的意识方面状态、呼吸道的分泌物等情况,选择最需要进行急救的患者的最佳的插管方式。
Objective：To emergency patients in different way of intubation application effect comparison.Methods：We treated patients with emergency 40 cases,according to patients with tracheal intubation and the different way of divided into D,C two groups,through the mouth in patients with tracheal intubation and 20 cases（group D）,through the nasal cavity for endotracheal intubation 20 cases（C group）.Two groups of patients with intubation time,maintain asked length,pipe diameter,pipe fixed,patients tolerance and appear complications.Results：Two groups of data comparison,here the difference of data with statistical significance.Conclusion：Through the mouth for endotracheal intubation and through the nasal cavity for endotracheal intubation all have their own advantages and disadvantages,therefore in the process of emergency treatment should be actual according to patients showed’s ideology state,respiratory secretions,and select the most suitable for the need for first aid of patients the best intubation way.
出处
《中国医药导刊》
2013年第6期951-952,共2页
Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词
急救
器官插管
应用
First aid
Organ intubation
Applications
