摘要
目的:通过对比普通、超细内镜检查受检者的血压、脉搏、恶心等反应,评价超细胃镜检查对上消化道检查、诊断、治疗的耐受性和安全性。方法:将我院门诊、病房178例对胃镜检查患者,随机均分为普通和超细检查组,观察受检者的血压、脉搏、恶心等反应。结果:两组胃镜检查在收缩压、舒张压、心率都有变化,存在过性的呼吸加快,甚至出现呼吸急促,且常规胃镜检查中反应更加剧烈。两组检查血氧饱和度均有的轻微的不同程度的降低,但不明显;检查完成时间两组间的差异无统计学意义。结论:相比较于普通胃镜,超细胃镜检查对受检者具有较高的安全性和较好的耐受性。
Objective：To compare the clients’ blood pressure pulse Blood pressure pulse/100 dynamic changes and Nausea reaction degree before halfway and the end of ordinary and Super fine endoscopic.Evaluate the safety of ultrafine endoscopy and resistance.Methods：Divided the 178 cases into ordinary and superfine group every 89 patients who have No choice intention about Gastroscope inspection way.Check the client’s blood pressure and pulse respectively before 2 minutes in the mid and the end of inspection and evaluat the client’s disgusting reaction.Results：The nasal group blood pressure pulse Blood pressure pulse /100 variation is inferior to the mouth group（P〈0.05）;There were no obvious difference of the finishing time between two groups of gastroscope inspection（P〈0.05）.The disgusting reaction of the nasal group is inferior to The mouth group（P〈0.05）.Conclusion：The nasal group blood pressure pulse Blood pressure pulse / 100 variation and disgusting reaction are both lesser client’s has higher security and good tolerance.
出处
《中国医药导刊》
2013年第6期924-924,927,共2页
Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词
超细内镜
安全性
耐受性
Super fine gastroscope
Blood pressure
safety
Tolerance
