期刊文献+

不同头部外形高速列车气动性能风洞试验研究 被引量:61

Wind tunnel experiment on aerodynamic characteristic of streamline head of high speed train with different head shapes
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对包括CRH2在内的4种不同纵向长细比比例尺为1:8的高速列车模型进行风洞试验,分析雷诺数对车辆气动力系数的影响;比较4种高速列车模型的气动力特性;对不同流线型外形列车进行大侧偏角试验,研究高速列车在侧风作用下的安全性。研究结果表明:列车流线型头部越长,鼻形更加突出尖锐,头部流线型更加光滑,更有利于降低空气阻力;当模型列车流线型长度相差不大时,纵向长细比系数越大即车头外形越细长,对减阻越有利;4种动车组头车、中车和尾车的侧向力及升力系数均随侧滑角的增大而迅速增大;当侧滑角大于10°时,头部最大纵剖面轮廓线曲率较大的模型,横风作用下的侧向力系数比其他3种模型车的侧向力系数显著增大,升力系数较小。 Wind tunnel experiments of four different longitudinal slenderness ratio high-speed trains including CRH2 were carried out to analyze the influence of Reynolds number on train aerodynamic force coefficients, with the scale of all models used being 1:8. The aerodynamics character of these four trains were compared and wind tunnel experiments were conducted with big side slip angle to research on the high-speed train safety under strong cross-wind. The results show that the aerodynamic drag can be reduced with the much longer streamlined head, more sharp nose and smoother streamlined head. Besides, when longitudinal slenderness ratio coefficient is lager, the head of train is longer and slender, it is the more favorable for the drag reduction when the difference among the length of train models is not much. As the side slip angle increases, the side force coefficient and lift coefficient of head car, middle car and tail car increase. When the side slip angle is greater than 10~, the side force of the train with the bigger maximum longitudinal profile curvature under cross-wind is significantly larger than those of the other three projects, while the lift coefficient is smaller.
作者 张在中 周丹
出处 《中南大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期2603-2608,共6页 Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51105384) 高铁联合基金重点项目(U1134203)
关键词 高速列车 风洞试验 气动外形 气动力 high speed train wind tunnel experiment aerodynamic shape aerodynamic forces
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1田红旗.中国列车空气动力学研究进展[J].交通运输工程学报,2006,6(1):1-9. 被引量:192
  • 2Baker C J. The flow around high speed trains[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2010, 98(6/7): 266-298.
  • 3Schetz J A. Aerodynamics of high-speed train[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 33: 371-414.
  • 4Baker C J, Jones J, Lopez-Calleja F, et al. Measurements of the cross wind forces on trains[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2004, 92(7/8): 547-563.
  • 5Gohlke M, Beaudoin J F, Amielh M, et al. Shape influence on mean forces applied on a ground vehicle under steady eross-wind[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynanaics, 2010, 98(8/9): 386-391.
  • 6Raghunathan R S, Kim S D, Setoguchi T. Aerodynamics of high-speed railway train[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38(6): 469-514.
  • 7周丹,田红旗,鲁寨军.国产磁浮列车气动外形的优化[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2006,37(3):613-617. 被引量:21
  • 8Khier W, Breuer M, Durst F. Flow structure around trains under side wind conditions: A numerical study[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2000, 29(2): 179-195.
  • 9梁习锋,田红旗.列车气动性能评估参数研究[J].中国铁道科学,2003,24(1):38-42. 被引量:23
  • 10杨明智,袁先旭,鲁寨军,黄汉杰.强侧风下青藏线列车气动性能风洞试验研究[J].实验流体力学,2008,22(1):76-79. 被引量:41

二级参考文献63

共引文献347

同被引文献530

引证文献61

二级引证文献300

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部