期刊文献+

Upper bound solutions for supporting pressures of shallow tunnels with nonlinear failure criterion 被引量:20

Upper bound solutions for supporting pressures of shallow tunnels with nonlinear failure criterion
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Linear failure criterion is widely used in calculation of earth pressure acting on shallow tunnels. However, experimental evidence shows that nonlinear failure criterion is able to represent fairly well the failure of almost all types of rocks, A nonlinear Hock-Brown failure criterion is employed to estimate the supporting pressures of shallow tunnels in limit analysis framework. Two failure mechanisms are proposed for calculating the work rate of extemal force and the internal energy dissipation. A tangential line to the nonlinear failure criterion is used to formulate the supporting pressure problem as a nonlinear programming problem. The objective function formulated in this way is minimized with respect to the failure mechanism and the location of tangency point. In order to assess the validity, the supporting pressures for the proposed failure mechanisms are calculated and compared with each other, and the present results are compared with previously published solutions when the nonlinear criterion is reduced to linear criterion. The agreement supports the validity of the proposed failure mechanisms. An experiment is conducted to investigate the influences of the nonlinear criterion on collapse shape and supporting pressures of shallow tunnels. 线性失败标准广泛地在对浅隧道起作用的地球压力的计算被使用。然而,试验性的证据证明那个非线性的失败标准能表示相当,很好,几乎所有的失败岩石打字。一个非线性的 Hoek 布郎失败标准被采用在限制分析框架估计浅隧道的支持的压力。二失败机制为计算外部力量和内部精力驱散的工作率被建议。到非线性的失败标准的一根正切的线被用来作为一个非线性的编程问题提出支持的压力问题。这样提出的客观功能关于失败机制和接触点的地点被最小化。以便估计有效性,为建议失败机制的支持的压力被计算,当非线性的标准被归结为线性标准时,与对方,和礼品相比,结果与以前出版的答案相比。协议支持建议失败机制的有效性。一个实验被进行在倒塌形状和浅隧道的支持的压力上调查非线性的标准的影响。
出处 《Journal of Central South University》 SCIE EI CAS 2013年第7期2034-2040,共7页 中南大学学报(英文版)
基金 Foundation item: Project(2013CB036004) supported by the National Basic Research Program of China Project(51178468) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
关键词 shallow tunnel nonlinear criterion limit analysis supporting pressure failure mechanism 非线性破坏准则 压力作用 浅埋隧道 非线性规划问题 上限 实验证据 失效机制 Brown
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1徐干成 白洪才 郑颖人 刘朝.地下工程支护结构[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2001..
  • 2JTG D70-2004,公路隧道设计规范[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2004.
  • 3TB10003-2001,铁路隧道设计规范[S].北京:中国铁道出版社,2001.
  • 4Chen W F. Limit analysis and soil mechanics [M]. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, 1975.
  • 5Donald I, Chen Z Y. Slope stability analysis by the upper bound approach: fundamentals and methods [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1997, 34(6): 853 - 862.
  • 6Wang Y J, Yin J H, Chen Z Y. Calculation of bearing capacity of a strip footing using an upper bound method [J]. International Journal for Nummerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2001, 25(8): 841 - 851.
  • 7Skrabl S, Macuh B. Upper-bound solutions of three-dimensional passive earth pressures [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(5): 1449-1460.
  • 8Atkinson J H, Potts D M. Stability of shallow tunnel in cohesionless soil [J]. Geotechnique, 1977, 27(2): 203-215.
  • 9Davis E H, Gunn M J, Mair R J. The stability of shallow tunnel and underground openings in cohesive material [J]. Geotechnique, 1980, 30(4): 397-416.
  • 10Leca E, Dormieux L. Upper and lower bound solutions for the face stability of shallow circular tunnels in frictional material [J]. Geotechnique, 1990, 40(4): 581- 606.

共引文献82

同被引文献107

引证文献20

二级引证文献130

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部