期刊文献+

两种乳酸菌胞外多糖对人体粪便菌群的影响 被引量:8

Modification of faecal microbiota by lactic acid bacteria exopolysaccharides in vitro
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的在体外利用7名志愿者的新鲜粪便作为来源,选择菊粉作为对照,研究干酪乳杆菌LC2W与鼠李糖乳杆菌Y37胞外多糖对人体肠道菌群的影响。方法利用PCR-DGGE(变性梯度凝胶电泳)方法分析样品中菌群组成,高效液相色谱分析培养前后胞外多糖组分变化。结果与菊粉相比,粪便菌群在添加乳杆菌胞外多糖培养后,Parabacteroides类群细菌明显增加,4名志愿者粪便样品中出现明显的双歧杆菌条带,两种乳杆菌胞外多糖对粪便菌群的影响差异无统计学意义;而添加菊粉培养后,Bacteroides类群细菌的条带明显增加。两种乳杆菌胞外多糖中主要是大分子量的部分被利用。结论干酪乳杆菌LC2W与鼠李糖乳杆菌Y37的胞外多糖在体外有调节粪便菌群的作用。 Objective The modification effect of exopolysaccharides(EPSs) produced by Lactobacillus casei LC2W as well as L.rhamnosus Y37 on the microbiota in fresh excreta of 7 healthy donors was investigated in vitro,with inulin as the positive control.Methods PCR-DGGE(polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis) was used to analyze the microflora,and HPLC was used to detect the residual LAB exopolysaccharides in the broth before and after incubation.Results Compared with faecal microbiota cultured with inulin,in which bacteria of Bacteroides group were enriched,the numbers and species of Parabacteroides were enriched in the faecal microbiota cultured with EPS from either L.casei LC2W or L.rhamnosus Y37.No significant difference between faecal microbiota cultured with the two Lactobacillus EPSs was observed.Furthermore,the exopolysaccharides from either L.casei LC2W or L.rhamnosus Y37 could be metabolized by faecal microbiota,especially the EPS fraction with high molecular weight.Conclusion Exopolysaccharides from L.casei LC2W as well as EPSs from L.rhamnosus Y37 could modify the microbiota in fecal slurry in vitro.
出处 《中国微生态学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2013年第7期750-756,761,共8页 Chinese Journal of Microecology
基金 国家科技部"973"计划(2010CB735705) 上海市经委引进技术的吸收与创新计划(2010CH-017)
关键词 胞外多糖 PCR-DGGE 粪便菌群 乳杆菌 Exopolysaccharides PCR-DGGE Faecal flora Lactobacillus
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1欧阳天贽,李小定,荣建华.真菌多糖抗肿瘤及免疫调节作用研究进展[J].天然产物研究与开发,2006,18(3):524-528. 被引量:44
  • 2Ercolini D, Russo F, Torrieri E, et al. Changes in the spoilage-related microbiota of beef during refrigerated storage under different packaging conditions[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2006, 72(7): 4663-4671.
  • 3http://www.pack.cn/SellDetail/1672256.html.
  • 4Ercolini D, Ferrocino I, La Storia A, et al. Development of spoilage microbiota in beef stored in nisin activated packaging[J]. Food Microbiology, 2010, 27(1): 137-143.
  • 5Jiang Y, Gao F, Xu XL, et al. Changes in the bacterial communities of vacuum-packaged pork during chilled storage analyzed by PCR-DGGE[J]. Meat Science, 2010, 86(4): 889-895.
  • 6Luo HF, Qi HY, Zhang HX. Assessment of the bacterial diversity in fenvalerate-treated soil[J]. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2004, 20(5): 509-515.
  • 7Li MY, Zhou GH, Xu XL, et al. Changes of bacterial diversity and main flora in chilled pork during storage using PCR-DGGE[J]. Food Microbiology. 2006.23(7): 607-611.
  • 8Jydegarrd-Axelsen AM, Hooiby PE, Holmstrom K, et al. CO2 and anaerobiosis-induced changes in physiology and gene expression of different Listeria monocytogenes strains[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004, 70(7): 4111-4117.
  • 9Kotzekidou P, Bloukas JG. Effect of protective cultures and packaging film permeability on shelf life of sliced vacuum-packed cooked ham[J]. Meat Science, 1996, 42(3): 333-345.
  • 10张香美,贾月梅,薛胜平,李树立.DGGE指纹技术在传统发酵食品开发中的应用[J].食品研究与开发,2008,29(5):167-171. 被引量:8

共引文献21

同被引文献167

引证文献8

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部