摘要
《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》在解决医疗损害侵权的案件中起了非常关键的作用。考虑到医疗行为是一个高风险行为,在有些情况下,即便医疗机构和医务人员不存在违法违规的过失行为,进行医疗活动也有可能发生患者人身损害的后果。立法者为了保护医生的合法权益,在《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》第六十条规定了3种抗辩事由。但是在其立法技术上,第六十条却错误地使用了封闭列举免责事由,导致其在实践中运用得非常困难,保护医生合法权益的立法目的的实现受到很大的限制。
Tort Liability Act of the People＇s Republic of China has played a crucial role in resolving medical injury tort cases. The health behavior is a high-risk behavior. In some cases, even the medical institutions and medical personnel is not illegal negligence. Medical activities may occur in patients with the consequences of personal injury. In order to pro- tect doctors＇ legitimate rights and interests, Article 60 provides three defenses in the Tort Liability Act of the People＇s Re- public of China. But technically in its legislation, Article 60 is the wrong use of the closed enumeration disclaimer subject, leading to its very difficult use in practice to achieve legislative purpose to protect the legitimate rights and interests of doctors under great restrictions.
出处
《中国医院管理》
2013年第7期43-45,共3页
Chinese Hospital Management
关键词
医疗损害责任
抗辩事由
立法技术
medical liability for damage, defense cause, legislative technique
