高校学生投入理论:内涵、特点及应用被引量：42

Analysis of the Connotation and Characteristics of Student Engagement/Involvement

导出

摘要学生投入理论从学生角度关注高等教育经历对学生的影响,阐述了学生花费的时间、精力与学习成果之间的正相关关系,同时也强调学校为学生提供的教育环境的重要性。该理论具有直接关注学生的动机和行为、重视学校环境的精心设计和非课堂投入等鲜明特点,从而区别于其他学生发展理论。目前,基于学生投入理论开展的各类调查研究方兴未艾,为我们探索有效的人才培养实践开辟了新路径。 Student Engagement/Involvement refers to the investment of physical and psychological energy in various objects. Involvement has both quantitative and qualitative features. The extent of a student＇s involvement in academic work can be measured quantita-tively and qualitatively. The effectiveness of any educational policy or practice is directly related to the capacity of that policy or practice to increase student involvement. The theory provides clues for designing more effective educational programs for students.

作者徐波

机构地区南京审计学院院长办公室

出处《高等教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期48-54,共7页 Journal of Higher Education

基金教育部人文社会科学研究项目(12YJC880127)

关键词学生投入非课堂投入全美学生投入情况调查 student engagement/involvement out of class engagement national survey of student engagement

分类号 G642 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献40

1RICK D A, AREND F. Defining Student Engagement[J]. Change: the Magazine of Higher Learning, 2011, (January/February) : 38-43.
2GEORGE D K. What Student Affairs ProfessionalsNeed to Know About Student Engagement[J]. Journal of College Student Development, 2009, 50 (6) : 683- 706.
3ALEXANDER W A. Achiving Educa-tional Excellence [ M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985:134,135-137,142,137.
4ALEXANDER W A. What Matters in College? Four Critical Years[-M]. San Francisco Jossey-Bass, 1992: 7-8.
5George D K. Student Success in College[-M]. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 2005 : 9.
6Bowen H R. Investment in Learning: The Individual and Social Value of American Higher Education[-M] San Francisco Jossey-Bass, 1977: 33.
7ALEXANDER W A. Student Involvement: ADevelopmental Theory for Higher Education[J]. Jour nal of College Student Development, 1999,40(5):518- 529.
8BAUER K W, LIANG Q. The Effect of Personality and Precollege Characteristics on First-year Activities and Academic Performance [J]. Journal of College Student Development, 2003,44 : 277-290.
9ENDO J J, HARPEL R L. The Effect of Student-fac- ulty Interaction on Students Educational Outcomes [J]. Research in Higher Education, 1982, 16: 115- 137.
10HU S, KUH G D. Being (dis)engaged in Dducation ally Purposeful Activities: The Influences of Student and Institutional Characteristics[-J]. Research in High- er Education, 2002,43:555 -575.