摘要
目的探讨综合护理方法运用于胫腓骨骨折骨牵引固定术后的护理疗效。方法本组173例胫腓骨骨折骨牵引固定术后的患者随机分为综合护理组105例和常规护理组68例。综合组采用健康教育、心理护理、一般护理、牵引的护理、功能锻炼等综合护理方法进行护理;常规组采用一般护理、牵引的护理等常规护理方法。比较两组的骨牵引时间和患者满意度。结果综合护理组的患者平均骨牵引时间(39.7±11.2)天,患者总满意率为97.1%;常规护理组的患者平均骨牵引时间(48.1±12.0)天,患者总满意率为86.8%。两组比较,综合护理组的平均骨牵引时间明显短于常规护理组,患者满意程度明显高于常规护理组,具有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论采用综合护理方法对胫腓骨骨折骨牵引固定术后的临床护理效果明显优于常规护理方法。
Objective To explore the nursing methods used in fracture of tibia and fibula bone traction fixation postoperative nursing. Methods the traction fixation postoperative patients were randomly divided into the intervention group 105 cases and routine nursing group 68 cases of bone in 173 cases with fracture of tibia and fibula. Comprehensive group used nursing care methods of health education, psychological nursing, nursing care,traction nursing,function exercise; routine group received general nursing,the nursing method of traction. Comparison of two groups of bone traction time and patient satisfaction. Results comprehensive nursing group had an average bone traction time was 39. 7 ± 11.2days,total satisfac- tion with rate of 97. 1% ; the average bone in patients with routine nursing group traction time was 48. 1 ± 12days, total satisfaction rate in patients with 86. 8 %. Comparing the two groups, the intervention group the average bone traction time was shorter than the routine nursing group, patient sat- isfaction was significantly higher than that of the conventional nursing group,with significant difference （ P 〈0.05）. Conclusion the comprehen- sive nursing methods for fracture of tibia and fibula bone traction clinical nursing effect is obviously better than that of routine nursing method of fixation.
出处
《中国中医药现代远程教育》
2013年第13期134-136,共3页
Chinese Medicine Modern Distance Education of China
关键词
胫腓骨骨折
骨牵引固定术
术后护理
综合护理
常规护理
Fracture of tibia and fibula
Bone traction fixation
Postoperative nursing
Nursing
Nursing
